Karl Popper's aim in Logik der Forschung is to consider the method of investigation used by the empirical sciences. Many people would say that their procedure is marked by the use of induction, and accordingly that the logic of scientific investigation is the logical analysis of induction. But Popper disagrees. Scientific procedure consists of two steps, an hypothesis is formed, and then it is tested. Logic is only concerned with questions of validity, and thus is only concerned with the second of these steps. But every method of testing validity is deductive, and thus the logic of scientific investigation is the study of deduction as used by the empirical sciences.
page 91 note 1 Œuvres de Jules Lachelier. Paris: Alcan, 1933. 2 vols. Pp. xlv + 219; pp. 224. 80 Fr. ensemble.Google Scholar
page 91 note 2 Festugiére, A. J., “Antisthenica,” Revue des Sciences philosophiques et theologiques, XXI, 1932. Pp. 345–75.Google Scholar
page 91 note 3 Rivaud, A. “Platon et la politique pythagoricienne” in Mélanges Gustave Glotz. Tome II. Pp. 779–92. Paris: Les Presses Universitaires, 1932.Google Scholar
page 91 note 4 Logik der Forschung. Vienna: Julius Springer. 1935. Pp. 248. RM. 13.50.Google Scholar
page 92 note 1 Vom Jenseits der Seele. Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke. 6th edition. Pp. 562, RM. 16.Google Scholar