No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
On Fundamentals: an Adventure
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 February 2009
Extract
Most men experience from time to time a wish to know something about the character of the larger reality in which they live, move, and have their being; something much more fundamental than any department of research classed as “scientific” can provide. And the most incurably practical of us has good reason for cherishing this wish. Metaphysics, i.e. inquiry into the general nature of reality, makes appeal first to the contemplative student interested in knowledge for its own sake, but it has a very noteworthy practical side as well. Few, like Earl Russell, can build the soul”s habitation on a “foundation of unyielding despair”; very many will not take life seriously unless its value, which must be lasting, is high. The problems stated by pessimism have to be solved; our burdens must be shown to be worth taking up strenuously. Religious consolations, once potent, are losing their force, and the danger of social decay has therefore to be countered. Let man suspect seriously that he is a day-fly, flitting about futilely a short while ere it perishes, and, whatever a few wild optimists may counsel, his big battalions are lost to progress. The East is right.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1932
References
page 382 note 1 Body and Mind, Preface, p. xiii.
page 383 note 1 Zermatt Dialogues, pp. 23–8.
page 383 note 2 Ibid., pp. 80, 84.
page 383 note 3 Ibid., pp. 33–9.
page 384 note 1 Zermatt Dialogues, pp. 67–9.
page 384 note 2 Wallace, , Logic of Hegel, p. 39.Google Scholar
page 385 note 1 Zermatt Dialogues, p. 70. The philosophy of Nature and Mind, taken as ensouled by logic, have as their problem “only to recognize the logical forms under the shapes they assume in Nature and Mind—shapes which are only a particular mode of expression for the forms of pure thought.” (Italics mine.) Wallace, , Logic of Hegel, pp. 41–2.Google Scholar
page 386 note 1 Letter to the writer.
page 387 note 1 Zermatt Dialogues, Foreword, pp. xix–xxv.
page 388 note 1 Cited from Professor Smith”s, Norman KempCommentary to Kant”s Critique of Pure Reason, p. 474.Google Scholar
page 388 note 2 “Imagining and Reasoning,” Philosophy, April, 1931.
page 388 note 3 Ibid., p. 194.
page 389 note 1 Studies in the Hegelian Dialectic, 2nd ed., p. 229.
page 389 note 2 Problems of Belief, p. 127.
page 390 note 1 On the “controlling force,” cf. Russell, Earl (Bertrand), Our Knowledge of the External World, p. 21.Google Scholar
page 390 note 2 Professor Montague, , Ways of Knowing, p. 65.Google Scholar
page 390 note 3 Hegel describes reason in the Philosophy of History as “substance as well as Infinite Power.”
page 391 note 1 On these two objections cf. Zermatt Dialogues, pp. 103–5.
page 391 note 2 Science and the Modern World, p. 249.
page 391 note 3 Zermatt Dialogues, pp. 88–9.
page 391 note 4 Logic, 2nd ed., p. 249.
page 393 note 1 Indian Philosophy, ii. 509.