Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T08:18:14.811Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Object of Observation and Knowledge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2009

Laurence J. Lafleur
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A passing remark may at times be a clearer indication of basic conceptions or misconceptions than a well-pondered dissertation, and the present article had its inception in a passing remark of Professor Dewey's, to the effect that no man has as yet seen an atom, although it is quite possible that atoms might be observed in the future.

Type
Articles
Information
Philosophy , Volume 18 , Issue 71 , November 1943 , pp. 195 - 203
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1943

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 197 note 1 See “Epistemological Functionalism,” Philosophical Review, 09 1941Google Scholar. For an application of this principle, cf. “A Functionalistic Interpretation of Mathematics,” Scripta Mathematica, 1941Google Scholar.

page 198 note 1 See “Conceptual Relativity,” Journal of Philosophy, vol. 37, No. 16, 08 1, 1940Google Scholar. For an application of this branch of the doctrine, cf. “Relativity in Biology,” Acta Biotheoretica, 05 1941Google Scholar.

page 203 note 1 Epistemological Functionalism, p. 472Google Scholar.