No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Extract
In his analysis of the concept of causality, Hume finds that all events accounted causes and effects are contiguous and successive. No object can act efficaciously upon another so long as the objects are at a distance from each other. It may sometimes appear that “distant objects are productive of one another,” but on examination it is discovered that they are linked together by a series of intermediate causes which are contiguous among themselves; and even where examination does not directly disclose the intermediate causal chain, it is still presumed that it exists. Also the cause is temporally prior to the effect. If I throw a stone through a window, the smashing of the glass follows the act of throwing the stone. It is only after the realization of the cause that the effect appears. Thus a cause is an object that is precedent to and contiguous with another object that is called the effect.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1941
References
page 185 note 1 Treatise, part 3, section 2.
page 185 note 2 Mysticism and Logic, p. 183Google Scholar.
page 186 note 1 L'Evolution créatrice, p. 42Google Scholar.
page 186 note 2 Cf. Johnson, W. E., Logic, part 3, p. 128Google Scholar.
page 187 note 1 Flint, Robert, Theism, pp. 124, 127Google Scholar.
page 187 note 2 E.g. Bouquet, A. C., A Study of the ordinary Arguments for the Existence and Nature of God, p. 25Google Scholar. Cf. Taylor, A. E., Elements of Metaphysics, pp. 183 ffGoogle Scholar. and Stocks, J. L., Time, Cause and EternityGoogle Scholar.
page 187 note 3 Ethics, 1. 15.
page 187 note 4 The Critique of Teleological Judgment, sections 77 f, etc.
page 188 note 1 See Bergson, op. cit., pp. 2, 5.
page 189 note 1 Modes of Thought, p. 228Google Scholar.
page 190 note 1 Plato, the Man and his Work, p. 455Google Scholar. Cf. Meyerson, , Identité et Réalité, chap. 9Google Scholar.
page 190 note 2 Cf. Religion and Science, pp. 199 ff., where Mr. Russell's evident purpose is to demonstrate that he, like all men, is destitute of purpose, being always subjected to complete determination by the antecedent states of atomic structures!
page 191 note 1 Op. cit., pp. 61 ff.
page 192 note 1 See La Revue de Metaphysique et de Morale (Paris), Nos. 2 and 3, 1935Google Scholar. Cf. La Revue philosophique (Paris), Nos. 1–4, 1937Google Scholar. These papers appear to be little known on this side of the Channel. Mr. Bergson told me recently that they are the most illuminating discussions of the matter that he had come across.
page 193 note 1 The Nature of the Physical World, pp. 293 ffGoogle Scholar.
page 194 note 1 The Mysterious Universe (Pelican edition), pp. 43 f. Cf. Russell, , Religion and Science, pp. 144 ff.Google Scholar, where there is similar confusion.
page 195 note 1 Identité el Réalité, p. 43; Cf. pp. 35 ff.
page 195 note 2 De la Contingence des Lois de la Nature, pp. 25 f. “Would an effect, a change, exist, if it did not differ from the antecedent either in quantity or in quality?” Boutroux also speaks of “the appearance of a new element which is the indispensable condition of a causal relationship.”