Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T23:10:44.947Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mechanism: A Rejoinder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2009

J. R. Lucas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy , Volume 45 , Issue 172 , April 1970 , pp. 149 - 151
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Lewis, David, “Lucas against Mechanism”, Philosophy, XLIV, 07 1969, pp. 231–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Coder, David, “Goedel's Theorem and Mechanism”, Philosophy, XLIV, 07 1969, pp. 234–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 Lucas, J. R., “Minds, Machines and Gödel”, Philosophy, XXXVI, 1961, pp. 112–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar; reprinted in Sayre, Kenneth M. and Crosson, Frederick J., eds., The Modelling of Mind, Notre Dame, 1963, pp. 255–271Google Scholar, and in Anderson, Alan Ross, ed., Minds and Machines, Englewood Cliffs, 1964, pp. 43–59.Google Scholar

4 For a fuller exposition of the dialectical nature of the argument see my “Satan Stultified”, The Monist, 52, 1968, pp. 154–7.Google Scholar or The Freedom of the Will, Oxford, 1970, §27, pp. 139–45.Google Scholar