Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T12:11:45.796Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Imitation and Actuality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

Donald McQueen
Donald McQueen
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy , Volume 57 , Issue 220 , January 1982 , pp. 260 - 262
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 It doesn't seem to be necessarily true that being a better imitation is the same as being closer to the real thing. All that is suggested here is that in this example the two coincide.

2 Guy Robinson, review of Artificial Intelligence and Natural Man by Margaret A. Boden (Brighton: Harvester Press, 1977) in Philosophy 54, No. 207, 130.

3 Cf. ‘Computing Machinery and Intelligence’ by A. M. Turing, Mind 59, No. 236 (1950), reprinted in Minds and Machines, A. R. Anderson (ed.) (Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1964).

4 I owe this example to Jonathan Harrison.

5 In the method employed in such an attempt, for example—Robinson's reference, in the passage quoted above, to the imitation of behavioural characteristics suggests such an argument.