Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T05:23:07.129Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How Classical Music is Better than Popular Music

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2016

James O. Young
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In at least one respect, classical music is superior to popular music. Classical music (understood as common practice composition) has greater potential for expressiveness and, consequently, has more potential for psychological insight and profundity. The greater potential for expressiveness in classical music is due, in large part, to it greater harmonic resources. The harmonies in classical music are more likely to be functional, more contrary motion is employed, and modulation is more common. Although popular music employs rhythms not found in classical music, on the whole there is less rhythmic variety in popular music than there is in classical.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy , Volume 91 , Issue 4 , October 2016 , pp. 523 - 540
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_popular_music_genres. Accessed 5 May, 2016.

2 Theodore W. Adorno, ‘On Popular Music’, in Cultural Theory and Popular Culture, third edition, ed. John Storey (Harlow: Pearson, 2006), 74–84.

3 Allan Bloom, Closing of the American Mind (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1987).

4 Roger Scruton, The Aesthetics of Music (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987).

5 Theodore Gracyk, Listening to Popular Music or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Led Zepplin (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2007).

6 Kidd, David Comer and Castano, Emanuele, ‘Reading Literary Fiction Improves Theory of Mind’, Science 342 (2013), 377–80CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

7 Björnberg, Alf, ‘On aeolian harmony in contemporary popular music’, Nordic IASPM Working Paper DK 1 (1989), 1 Google Scholar.

8 de Clercq, Trevor and Temperley, David, ‘A corpus analysis of rock harmony’, Popular Music 30 (2011), 47–70 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Smith, J. David and Melara, Robert J., ‘Aesthetic preference and syntactic prototypicality in music: ‘Tis the gift to be simple’ Cognition, 34 (1990), 279–298 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

10 Op. cit. note 7, 2.

11 Biamonte, Nicole, ‘Triadic Modal and Pentatonic Patterns in Rock Music’, Music Theory Spectrum 32 (2010), 95–110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Leonard B. Meyer, Emotion and Meaning in Music (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1956), 54.

13 Steinbeis, Nikolaus, Koelsch, Stefan and Sloboda, John A., ‘The Role of Harmonic Expectancy Violations in Musical Emotions: Evidence from Subjective, Physiological, and Neural Responses’, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18 (2006), 1380–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Sloboda, John A., ‘Music Structure and Emotional Response’, Psychology of Music 19 (1991), 110–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 Allan F. Moore was among the first to note this feature of popular music harmony. See, for example, his Rock: The Primary Text, 2nd ed. (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2001), 52ff.

16 Op. cit. note 7, 3.

17 Lerdahl, Fred, ‘Calculating Tonal Tension’, Music Perception 13 (1996), 319–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 Krumhansl, Carol L., ‘A Perceptual Analysis of Mozart's Piano Sonata K. 282: Segmentation, Tension, and Musical Ideas’, Music Perception 13 (1996), 401–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

19 Moore, Allan, ‘The so–called “flattened seventh” in rock’ Popular Music 14 (1995), 190 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20 See, for example, Brower, Candace, ‘A Cognitive Theory of Musical Meaning’, Journal of Music Theory 44 (2000), 370 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

21 Charles–Henri Blainville, L'esprit de l'art musical, ou réflexions sur la musique, et ses différentes parties (Geneva, 1754), 61–2.

22 Korsakova-Kreyn, Marina and Dowling, W. Jay, ‘Emotional Processing in Music: Study in Affective Responses to Tonal Modulation in Controlled Harmonic Progressions and Real Music’, Psychomusicology: Music, Mind, and Brain 24 (2014), 4–20 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

23 Hevner, Kate, ‘The Affective Character of the Major and Minor Modes in Music’, American Journal of Psychology 47 (1935), 103–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

24 Op. cit. note 5, 18.

25 Not coincidentally, Brian Wilson composed the songs on Pet Sounds, the album from which ‘God Only Knows’ is drawn, after hearing The Beatles' Rubber Soul. Wilson resolved to match The Beatles' achievement on The Beatles' terms.

26 Johansson, K.G., ‘The Harmonic Language of the Beatles’, STM–online 2 (1999)Google Scholar.

27 Carpenter, Francesca R. Dillman and Potter, Robert F., ‘Effects of Music on Physiological Arousal: Explorations into Tempo and Genre’, Media Psychology 10 (2007), 339–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

28 Op. cit. note 27, 351.

29 Walton, Kendall, ‘Categories of Art’, Philosophical Review 79 (1970), 334–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

30 Op. cit. note 8, 56.

31 Schäfer, Thomas and Sedlmeier, Peter, ‘From the functions of music to music preference’, Psychology of Music 37 (2009), 279–300 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

32 Laiho, Luvi, ‘The Psychological Functions of Music in Adolescence’, Nordic Journal of Music Therapy 13 (2004), 47–63 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

33 T.S. Eliot, Poetry and Drama (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1951), 42–3.

34 Charles Batteux, The Fine Arts Reduced to a Single Principle, trans. James O. Young (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 140.

35 Edward Macan, ‘Bring Back the Balance’, in Scott Calef (ed.), Led Zeppelin and Philosophy: All Will be Revealed (Chicago, Il: Open Court, 2009), 199.

36 Scott Calef, ‘A Little of the Human Touch: Knowledge and Empathy in the Music of Bruce Springsteen’, in Randall E. Auxier and Doug Anderson (eds), Bruce Springsteen and Philosophy (Chicago: Open Court, 2008), 225.

37 An earlier version on this essay was written for a panel on popular art organised by Stephanie Ross and held on 19 February 2015 at the American Philosophical Association Central Division meeting in St. Louis. Subsequent versions were presented at the Dubrovnik Philosophy of Art Conference, 24 April 2015 and the American Society for Aesthetics Conference, Savannah, Georgia, 15 November 2015. Audience members at these talks, particularly Ted Gracyk and Stephen Davies, provided valuable comments. In the course of writing this paper, I profited from discussions with Craig Derksen.