^{page 122 note 1} Religion and Philosophy, London, 1916, 49.Google Scholar

^{page 122 note 2} Speculum Mentis, Oxford, 1923, 211.Google Scholar

^{page 122 note 3} idem, 217.

^{page 124 note 1} Speculum Mentis, 199.

^{page 124 note 2} idem, 202.

^{page 125 note 1} Speculum Mentis, 185.

^{page 125 note 2} Religion and Philosophy, 49.

^{page 125 note 3} Speculum Mentis, 281.

^{page 126 note 1} Spectulum Mentis, 234, 238.

^{page 126 note 2} idem, 246.

^{page 127 note 1} Religion and Philosophy, 51.

^{page 127 note 2} Speculum Mentis, 56.

^{page 128 note 1} The status of time in Collingwood's system has to be dealt with separately. See the present author's: Between Past and Present, the Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn., 1960.Google Scholar

^{page 128 note 2} “The Nature and Aims of a Philosophy of History,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society XXV, London, 1924–1925.Google Scholar

^{page 128 note 3} idem, 153.

^{page 129 note 1} “The Nature and Aims”, etc., 168.

^{page 129 note 2} See: “Sensation and Thought”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, London, 1923.Google Scholar

^{page 129 note 3} “The Nature and Aims”, etc., 167.

^{page 129 note 4} idem, 170.

^{page 130 note 1} “The Nature and Aims”, etc., 164.

^{page 130 note 2} idem, 165.

^{page 131 note 1} An Autobiography, Penguin Books, 79.

^{page 131 note 2} The New Leviathan, Oxford, 1942, p. 61.Google Scholar

^{page 131 note 3} idem, p. 61.

^{page 131 note 4} idem, p. 61.

^{page 132 note 1} The Idea of History, edited by Knox, T. M., Oxford, 1945, p. 210 note.Google Scholar

^{page 132 note 2} idem, 303.

^{page 133 note 1} Autobiography, 22.

^{page 133 note 2} idem, 75.

^{page 134 note 1} Autobiography, 76.

^{page 135 note 1} The Idea of History, 214.

^{page 135 note 2} Croce's Philosophy of History, The Hibbert Journal, Vol. XIX, London, 1921, p. 274. Compare: Speculum Mentis, 218.

^{page 135 note 3} idem, idem.

^{page 135 note 4} Ruskin's Philosophy, Kendal, 1920, 20.

^{page 136 note 1} The Idea of History, 219. For a different interpretation of the saying, see Speculum Mentis, 218.

^{page 136 note 2} The Idea of History, 226.

^{page 137 note 1} The Idea of History, 190.