Article contents
The Essential Anna
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 January 2009
Extract
Having distinguished essentially fictional characters from inessentially fictional ones (a distinction I shall examine later) and having identified Anna Karenina as an inessentially fictional character, Barrie Paskins solves the problem I posed in ‘How Can We Be Moved by the Fate of Anna Karenina?’ thus: ‘our pity towards the inessentially fictional is, or can without forcing be construed as, pity for those people if any who are in the same bind as the character in the fiction’. Making a similar point in a footnote, ‘our emotions towards fictional characters are directed towards those real people, if any, who are in essentially the same situation’, he continues in the text, ‘This possibility is neglected by Radford and Weston.’
- Type
- Discussion
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1979
References
1 P.A.S., Suppl., 49 (1975), 67–80.Google Scholar
2 ‘On Being Moved by Anna Karenina and Anna Karenina’, Philosophy 52, No. 201 (07 1977), 344–347.Google Scholar
3 Let me point out here that, when we can put such explanations to the test, we sometimes discover that they are false.
- 5
- Cited by