¹ Space limitations confine this review to only a few of the many significant claims in the book. I omit any discussion of Part III, which offers psychoanalysis as a method to investigate one's emotions and undo emotional problems.

² See James, William, ‘What Is an Emotion?’, Mind 9 (1884), 127–43Google Scholar; Stocker, Michael, ‘Psychic Feelings and Their Irreducibility’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61 (1983), 5–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Goldie, Peter, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration (Oxford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar, among others.

³ Goldie, op. cit., note 2, 76–77.

⁴ Wollheim, Richard, On the Emotions (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1999)Google Scholar.

⁵ See, e.g., Dretske, Fred, Explaining Behavior: Reasons in a World of Causes (MIT Press, 1988), 110–1Google Scholar.

⁶ The associative imagination is claimed to correspond to one sense of the psychoanalytic concept of the unconscious, while avoiding ‘a homuncular view of the unconscious as a little interpreter in the mind’ (141). Readers are unfortunately never told exactly what the homuncular view is or why philosophers would adopt it.

⁷ Call E indeterministic just in case, given any set of conditions, it remains possible for E either to occur or not occur in light of those conditions. Conversely, E being deterministic would mean that there was some set of conditions in light of which E was necessitated. Given those conditions, it was not possible for E not to occur.

⁸ Brett, Nathan, ‘Human Habits’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 11 (1981), 364CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

⁹ Sigmund Freud, Standard Edition, vol. I, 319, and vol. V, 594.

¹⁰ Wollheim, R., Sigmund Freud (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1971), 48Google Scholar, and The Thread of Life (Harvard University Press, 1984), 902Google Scholar.

¹¹ S. Freud, Standard Edition, vol. XIV, 118–121, 133–135.

¹² Thanks to Talia Morag for her input and to Irene Liu and Kim Frost for their feedback on the review.