Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T07:59:01.817Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Determinism: Did Libet Make the Case?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2012

Daniel N. Robinson
Daniel N. Robinson*
Affiliation:
Oxford University
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Benjamin Libet's influential publications have raised important questions about voluntarist accounts of action. His findings are taken as evidence that the processes in the central nervous system associated with the initiation of an action occur earlier than the decision to act. However, in light of the methods employed and of relevant findings drawn from research addressed to the timing of neurobehavioural processes, Libet's conclusions are untenable.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy , Volume 87 , Issue 3 , July 2012 , pp. 395 - 401
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Seifert, Josef, ‘In defense of free will: A critique of Benjamin Libet’, Rev. Metaphys. 65 (2011), 377–407Google Scholar. Libet, Benjamin, ‘Do we have free will?’ in The Oxford Handbook of Free Will, (ed.) Kane, Robert (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), 551–564Google Scholar.

2 As a given response recorded from the surface of the scalp is far weaker than the background electrical activity of the brain, an averaging procedure is required if the stimulus-locked reactions are to be distinguished from the background.

3 See, e.g., Slater, R., ‘Serial evoked potential studies and MRI imaging in chronic progressive multiple sclerosis’. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 171(2) (1999), 79–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Shinoura, N., Yamada, R., Suzuki, Y., Kodama, T., Sekiguchi, K., Takahashi, M., Yag, K., ‘Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is More Reliable than Somatosensory Evoked Potential or Mapping for the Detection of the Primary Motor Cortex in Proximity to a Tumor’, Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery 85 (2007)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Liu, Zhongming, Ding, Lei, and He, Bin, ‘Integration of EEG/MEG with MRI and fMRI in Functional Neuroimaging’, IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 25(4) (2006), 46–53Google Scholar.

4 The locus classicus is Lashley, K. S. ‘The problem of serial order in behavior’ in Jeffress, L. A. (ed.), Cerebral mechanisms in behavior New York: Wiley, (1951), 112–131Google Scholar. Consider a pianist attempting the final movement of the Moonlight Sonata and approaching the work by striking a note, assessing the consequences, then striking another, etc. Rather, the virtuoso has so overtrained that the entire template of the piece is what has been formed and stored, such that the arpeggios are, as it were, ‘read out’ en bloc.

5 Haggard, P., Clark, S., & Kalogeras, J. ‘Voluntary action and conscious awareness’, Nature Neuroscience 5 (2002), 382–385CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

6 Rose, D. & Summers, J. ‘Duration illusions in a train of visual stimuli’, Perception 24 (1995), 1177–1187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 Liddle, Elizabeth and Jackson, Stephen R., ‘Recalibrating Time: When Did I Do that?’ Current Biology 16(23) (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Eagleman, David M. and Pariyadath, Vani, ‘Is subjective duration a signature of coding efficiency?’ Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 364 (2009), 1841–1851.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

9 Keller, I. and Heckhausen, H., ‘Readiness potentials preceding spontaneous motor acts: voluntary vs. involuntary control’, EEG Clin. Neurophysiol 82 (1992), 85–86Google Scholar.

10 Nishigan, S., Hayasaka, Y. and Okamoto, K., ‘Measurement of readiness potential of involuntary movement’ J. Adv. Sci. 12(1/2) (2000), 53–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar. RPs were recorded for saliva swallowing in states of wakefulness and and light sleep. Evoked potentials after swallowing were observed in both conditions. The results established that RPs are present in sleeping subjects.

11 Afshar, Afsheen, Santhanam, Gopal, Yu, Byron M., Ryu, Stephen I., Sahani, Maneesh, Shenoy, Krishna V.. ‘Single-Trial Neural Correlates of Arm Movement Preparation’, Neuron 71(3) (2011), 555–564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

12 Fehrer, E., & Raab, D. ‘Reaction time to stimuli masked by metacontrast’, Journal of Experimental Psychology 23 (1962), 143–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 Haggard, Patrick, ‘Human volition: towards a neuroscience of will’, Nature, Reviews Neuroscience 9 (2008), 934–946CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

14 See, for example, Gilden, L., Vaughan, H. and Const, L., ‘Summated human EEG potentials with voluntary movement’, Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 20 (1966), 433–438CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.