Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:24:59.768Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Common Sense Metaphysics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2009

N. M. L. Nathan
Affiliation:
University of Reading

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See for example Smart, J. J. C., Philosophy and Scientific Realism (London 1963)Google Scholar; Armstrong, D. M., A Materialist Theory of Mind (London 1968)Google Scholar; Bloor, David, “Is the Official Theory of Mind Absurd?”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 21 (1970) pp. 167183CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lonergan, B., Insight (London 1957)Google Scholar; Slote, M. A., “Religion, Science and the Extraordinary” in Rescher, N. (ed.), Studies in the Philosophy of Science (Oxford 1969)Google Scholar; Swinburne, R. G., “The Argument from Design”, Philosophy 43 (1968) pp. 199211CrossRefGoogle Scholar; ibid., “The Christian Wager”, Religious Studies 4 (1969) pp. 217–228; Smart, N., Philosophers and Religious Truth (London 1964) ch. IVGoogle Scholar; Swinburne, R. G., “Physical Determinism” in Vesey, G. (ed.). Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures vol. III (London 1970).Google Scholar

2 Cf. Plantinga, A., God and Other Minds (Ithaca 1967) pp. 99107.Google Scholar

3 In Vesey, G. (ed.), Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures vol. III (London 1970).Google Scholar

4 Op. cit. p. 164.

5 Op. cit. p. 166.