Article contents
Causes
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 February 2009
Extract
In an essay on ‘The Notion of Cause’ reprinted in Mysticism and Logic (and which constituted the presidential address to the Aristotelian Society in the year 1912) Russell argued ‘that the word ‘cause” is so inextricably bound up with misleading associations as to make its complete extrusion from the philosophical vocabulary desirable’.1 His argument here to the effect that ‘cause’ is not a central concept in science, as philosophers have thought it, is reminiscent of Norman Campbell's statement in Physics: The Elements (1920) and in What is Science? (1921).
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1963
References
page 149 note 1 Mysticism and Logic, Pelican, ed., 1953, p. 171.Google Scholar
page 149 note 2 Human Knowledge, p. 134.Google Scholar
page 150 note 1 Wolf, A., Correspondence of Spinoza, 1928, p. 80.Google Scholar
page 151 note 1 Second edition, 1933, p. 276.Google Scholar
page 151 note 2 Boas, M., Robert Boyle, p. 93Google Scholar
page 152 note 1 Works, Vol. V, p. 245.Google Scholar
page 154 note 1 SirJeffreys, H., Scientific Inference (2d. ed.), 1957, p. 78.Google Scholar
page 154 note 2 Ibid., p. 31, p. 28.
page 154 note 3 Treatise, Bk. I, Pt. III, Section 8.Google Scholar
page 156 note 1 Kr. r. V. B 162-3.
page 156 note 2 Ibid., B. 163.
page 156 note 3 Ibid., B 122.
page 158 note 1 Human Knowledge, p. 506.Google Scholar
page 158 note 2 Ibid., p. 486.
- 1
- Cited by