Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T05:23:14.780Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Art and Censorship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

Anthony O'Hear
Affiliation:
University of Bradford

Extract

We spent a wonderful morning in the van Gogh gallery in Amsterdam. Of course we knew all the paintings, we had seen them all in reproduction, and the building was more like a bank vault than a setting for art. But what art! At first sight how small and uniform the paintings were in reality: yet every blade of grass, every flower in a field, every olive tree, every vibration in the sky, every patch of colour, every brush stroke, testified to life and to a life vibrating beneath the surface form. In a true sense, an artist inspired, an artist breaking convention, artistic and social, but nevertheless an artist transforming life with a vision of the enhancement of life, a vision inviting each one of us to look again at the natural forms around us, to feel the spirit or the gods dwelling in them, a vision of enchantment and of humanity in a disenchanted world. Art—painting—can, then, be a source of spiritual nourishment as Kant and Schiller and Ruskin in their different ways thought it should be.

Type
Discussion
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Nietzsche, F., Will to Power (posthumous), Kaufmann, Walter (ed.) (New York: Vintage Books, 1968), Section 827.Google Scholar

2 Danto, Arthur, ‘Bad Aesthetic times in the USA’, Modern Painters, Vol. 2, No. 2, Summer 1989, pp. 55–9, at pp. 55–6.Google Scholar

3 Danto, , loc. cit., p. 57.Google Scholar