Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Page, Matthew J.
Moher, David
Fidler, Fiona M.
Higgins, Julian P. T.
Brennan, Sue E.
Haddaway, Neal R.
Hamilton, Daniel G.
Kanukula, Raju
Karunananthan, Sathya
Maxwell, Lara J.
McDonald, Steve
Nakagawa, Shinichi
Nunan, David
Tugwell, Peter
Welch, Vivian A.
and
McKenzie, Joanne E.
2021.
The REPRISE project: protocol for an evaluation of REProducibility and Replicability In Syntheses of Evidence.
Systematic Reviews,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 1,
Machery, Edouard
2021.
A mistaken confidence in data.
European Journal for Philosophy of Science,
Vol. 11,
Issue. 2,
Kubiak, Adam P.
and
Kawalec, Paweł
2021.
The epistemic consequences of pragmatic value-laden scientific inference.
European Journal for Philosophy of Science,
Vol. 11,
Issue. 2,
Lantian, A.
2021.
Les pratiques de recherche ouvertes en psychologie.
Psychologie Française,
Vol. 66,
Issue. 1,
p.
71.
Fletcher, Samuel C.
2021.
How (not) to measure replication.
European Journal for Philosophy of Science,
Vol. 11,
Issue. 2,
Farrar, Benjamin G.
and
Ostojić, Ljerka
2021.
It’s not just the animals that are STRANGE.
Learning & Behavior,
Vol. 49,
Issue. 2,
p.
169.
Cristia, Alejandrina
Tsuji, Sho
and
Bergmann, Christina
2022.
A meta-analytic approach to evaluating the explanatory adequacy of theories.
Meta-Psychology,
Vol. 6,
Issue. ,
Colaço, David
Bickle, John
and
Walters, Bradley
2022.
When should researchers cite study differences in response to a failure to replicate?.
Biology & Philosophy,
Vol. 37,
Issue. 5,
Chinman, Matthew
Acosta, Joie
Ebener, Patricia
and
Shearer, Amy
2022.
“What We Have Here, Is a Failure to [Replicate]”: Ways to Solve a Replication Crisis in Implementation Science
.
Prevention Science,
Vol. 23,
Issue. 5,
p.
739.
Cavazos, Robert Lee
Taylor, Keelyn
Eary, R. Brandon
and
Doty, Scott
2022.
Institutional and Individual Effects of Greenwashing on Food Waste.
Sustainability,
Vol. 15,
Issue. 1,
p.
221.
Ventura, Rafael
2022.
Publish without bias or perish without replications.
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science,
Vol. 96,
Issue. ,
p.
10.
Nickels, Lyndsey
Fischer-Baum, Simon
and
Best, Wendy
2022.
Single case studies are a powerful tool for developing, testing and extending theories.
Nature Reviews Psychology,
Vol. 1,
Issue. 12,
p.
733.
El-Khaled, Yusuf C.
Kler Lago, Alexandra
Mezger, Selma D.
and
Wild, Christian
2022.
Comparative Evaluation of Free Web Tools ImageJ and Photopea for the Surface Area Quantification of Planar Substrates and Organisms.
Diversity,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 4,
p.
272.
Nosek, Brian A.
Hardwicke, Tom E.
Moshontz, Hannah
Allard, Aurélien
Corker, Katherine S.
Dreber, Anna
Fidler, Fiona
Hilgard, Joe
Kline Struhl, Melissa
Nuijten, Michèle B.
Rohrer, Julia M.
Romero, Felipe
Scheel, Anne M.
Scherer, Laura D.
Schönbrodt, Felix D.
and
Vazire, Simine
2022.
Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science.
Annual Review of Psychology,
Vol. 73,
Issue. 1,
p.
719.
Penders, Bart
2022.
Process and Bureaucracy: Scientific Reform as Civilisation.
Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society,
Vol. 42,
Issue. 4,
p.
107.
Haig, Brian D.
2022.
Understanding Replication in a Way That Is True to Science.
Review of General Psychology,
Vol. 26,
Issue. 2,
p.
224.
Feest, Uljana
2022.
Data quality, experimental artifacts, and the reactivity of the psychological subject matter.
European Journal for Philosophy of Science,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 1,
Ventura, Rafael
2023.
Reliability models in cultural phylogenetics.
Biology & Philosophy,
Vol. 38,
Issue. 3,
Titleman, Mark
2023.
Rules, Reproducibility, and the Brief Frenzy of Animal Magnetism: Epistemological Foundations of Trust in French Enlightenment Medicine.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Peels, Rik
and
Bouter, Lex
2023.
Replication and trustworthiness.
Accountability in Research,
Vol. 30,
Issue. 2,
p.
77.