Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T00:17:32.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Well-Defined Interventions and Causal Variable Choice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2022

Zili Dong Open the ORCID record for Zili Dong [Opens in a new window]
Zili Dong*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Western University, London, ON, Canada
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There has been much debate among scientists and philosophers about what it means for (hypothetical) interventions invoked in causal inference to be “well-defined” and how considerations of this sort should constrain the choice of causal variables. In this article, I propose that an intervention is well-defined just in case the effect of interest is well-defined, and that the intervention can serve as a suitable means to identify that effect. Based on this proposal, I identify several types of ambiguous intervention. Implications for variable choice are discussed using case studies drawn from the sciences.

Type
Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 90 , Issue 2 , April 2023 , pp. 395 - 412
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chalupka, Krzysztof, Eberhardt, Frederick, and Perona, Pietro. 2016. “Multi-level Cause-Effect Systems.” Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, PMLR 51:361–69.Google Scholar
Chalupka, Krzysztof, Eberhardt, Frederick, and Perona, Pietro. 2017. “Causal Feature Learning: An Overview.” Behaviormetrika 44 (1):137–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cypess, Aaron M. 2022. “Reassessing Human Adipose Tissue.” New England Journal of Medicine 386 (8):768–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eberhardt, Frederick, and Scheines, Richard. 2007. “Interventions and Causal Inference.” Philosophy of Science 74 (5):981–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glymour, Clark, and Glymour, Madelyn R.. 2014. “Commentary: Race and Sex Are Causes.” Epidemiology 25 (4):488–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maria, Glymour, M., and Spiegelman, Donna. 2017. “Evaluating Public Health Interventions: 5. Causal Inference in Public Health Research—Do Sex, Race, and Biological Factors Cause Health Outcomes?” American Journal of Public Health 107 (1):81–85.Google Scholar
Greene, Catherine. 2020. “Nomadic Concepts, Variable Choice, and the Social Sciences.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 50 (1):3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamer, Dean, Brian Mustanski, Randall Sell, Sanders, Stephanie A., and Garcia, Justin R.. 2021. “Comment on “Large-Scale GWAS Reveals Insights into the Genetic Architecture of Same-Sex Sexual Behavior.” Science 371 (6536):eaba2941.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hernán, Miguel A. 2016. “Does Water Kill? A Call for Less Casual Causal Inferences.” Annals of Epidemiology 26 (10):674–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernán, Miguel A., and Taubman, Sarah L.. 2008. “Does Obesity Shorten Life? The Importance of Well-Defined Interventions to Answer Causal Questions.” International Journal of Obesity 32 (3):S8–S14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holland, Paul W. 1986. “Statistics and Causal Inference.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 81 (396):945–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, Paul W. 2008. “Causation and Race.” In White Logic, White Methods: Racism and Methodology, edited by Zuberi, Tukufu and Bonilla-Silva, Eduardo, 93–109. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
James, Michael, and Burgos, Adam. 2020. “Race.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/race/.Google Scholar
Marcellesi, Alexandre. 2013. “Is Race a Cause?” Philosophy of Science 80 (5):650–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCann, Kevin S. 2000. “The Diversity–Stability Debate.” Nature 405 (6783):228–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pearl, Judea. 2009. Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearl, Judea. 2018. “Does Obesity Shorten Life? Or Is It the Soda? On Non-manipulable Causes.” Journal of Causal Inference 6 (2):20182001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearl, Judea. 2019. “On the Interpretation of do(x).” Journal of Causal Inference 7 (1):20192002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiss, Julian. 2005. “Causal Instrumental Variables and Interventions.” Philosophy of Science 72 (5):964–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, Donald B. 1974. “Estimating Causal Effects of Treatments in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies.” Journal of Educational Psychology 66 (5):688–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, Sharon, Prins, Seth J., Campbell, Ulka B., and Gatto, Nicolle M.. 2016. “Is the ‘Well-Defined Intervention Assumption’ Politically Conservative?” Social Science & Medicine 166:254–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spirtes, Peter, Glymour, Clark N., Scheines, Richard, and Heckerman, David. 2000. Causation, Prediction, and Search. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Spirtes, Peter, and Scheines, Richard. 2004. “Causal Inference of Ambiguous Manipulations.” Philosophy of Science 71 (5):833–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanderWeele, Tyler J. 2018. “On Well-Defined Hypothetical Interventions in the Potential Outcomes Framework.” Epidemiology 29 (4):e24–e25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woodward, James. 2003. Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Woodward, James. 2008. “Invariance, Modularity, and All That: Cartwright on Causation.” In Nancy Cartwright’s Philosophy of Science, edited by Hartmann, Stephan, Hoefer, Carl, and Bovens, Luc, 198–237. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Woodward, James. 2015. “Interventionism and Causal Exclusion.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 91 (2):303–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, James. 2016. “The Problem of Variable Choice.” Synthese 193 (4):1047–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar