Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:12:43.321Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Variable Definition and Independent Components

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Abstract

In the causal modeling literature, it is well known that ill-defined variables may give rise to ambiguous manipulations. Here, we illustrate how ill-defined variables may also induce mistakes in causal inference when standard causal search methods are applied. To address the problem, we introduce a representation framework, which exploits an independent component representation of the data, and demonstrate its potential for detecting ill-defined variables and avoiding mistaken causal inferences.

Type
Causation
Copyright
Copyright 2021 by the Philosophy of Science Association. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Eberhardt, F. 2016. “Green and Grue Causal Variables.” Synthese 193:1029–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyvärinen, A., Karhunen, J., and Oja, E.. 2001. Independent Component Analysis. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pearl, J. 2009. Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, J., Janzing, D., and Schölkopf, B.. 2017. Elements of Causal Inference. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Spirtes, P., Glymour, C., and Scheines, R.. 2000. Causation, Prediction, and Search. 2nd ed. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Spirtes, P., and Scheines, R.. 2004. “Causal Inference of Ambiguous Manipulations.” Philosophy of Science 71:833–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, J. 2016. “The Problem of Variable Choice.” Synthese 193:1047–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar