Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-cx56b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T13:41:19.150Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Value Commitments, Value Conflict, and the Separability of Belief and Value

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Isaac Levi*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Columbia University

Abstract

Leeds (1990) levels an objection against the criterion of rational choice I have proposed (Levi 1997, Ch. 6; 1980; 1986), pointing out that the criterion is sensitive to the way possible consequences are partitioned. Seidenfeld, Kadane and Schervish (1989) call into question the defense of the cross product rule by appeal to Pareto Unanimity Principles that I had invoked in my 1986. I offer clarifications of my proposals showing that the difference between my views and those of my critics concerns the extent to which full belief, probabilistic belief, and value judgment are separable.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Send requests for reprints to the author, 718 Philosophy Hall, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027.

Thanks are due to Teddy Seidenfeld, Philip Kitcher, and an anonymous referee for helpful criticism.

References

Anscombe, Frank J. and Aumann, Robert J. (1963), “A Definition of Subjective Probability”, Annals of Mathematical Statistics 35: 199–205.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf (1952), Continuum of Inductive Methods. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf. (1962), “The Aim of Inductive Logic”, in Nagel, E., Suppes, P., and Tarski, A. (eds.), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, Ronald A. (1959), Statistical Methods and Scientific Inference, 2nd ed. New York: Hafner.Google Scholar
Goodman, Jay (1988), “Existence of Compromises in Simple Group Decisions”, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Statistics, Carnegie Mellon UniversityGoogle Scholar
Hild, Matthias (1998), “The Instability of Ex Post Aggregation”, unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Hild, Matthias, Jeffrey, Richard C., and Risse, Matthias (1998), “Preference Aggregation after Harsanyi”, in Weymark, J. A. and Salles, M. (eds.), Justice, Political Theory and Utilitarianism: Themes from Harsanyi and Rawls. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, Richard C. (1983), “Bayesianism with a Human Face”, in Earman, John (ed.) Testing Scientific Theories. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 10. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 133–156.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, Richard C. (1992), Probability and the Art of Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyburg, Henry E. (1961), Probability and the Logic of Rational Belief. Middletown, CN: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Kyburg, Henry E. (1974), The Logical Foundations of Statistical Inference, Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeds, Stephen (1990), “Levi's Decision Theory” (Discussion Note), Philosophy of Science 57: 158168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, Isaac (1967), “Probability Kinematics”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 18: 197209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, Isaac. (1967a), Gambling with Truth. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Levi, Isaac. (1980), The Enterprise of Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levi, Isaac. (1985), “Imprecision and Indeterminacy in Probability Judgment”, Philosophy of Science 36: 331340.Google Scholar
Levi, Isaac. (1984), Decisions and Revisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, Isaac. (1986), Hard Choices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, Isaac. (1988), “Possibility and Probability”, Erkenntnis 31: 365386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, Isaac. (1997), The Covenant of Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mongin, Philippe (1995), “Consistent Bayesian Aggregation”, Journal of Economic Theory 66: 313351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidenfeld, Teddy (1993), “Outline of a Theory of Partially Ordered Preferences”, Philosophical Topics 21: 173189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidenfeld, Teddy, Kadane, Jay, and Schervish, Mark (1989), “On the Shared Preferences of Two Bayesian Decision Makers”, The Journal of Philosophy 86: 225244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar