Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T21:16:29.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Units of Decision

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Mariam Thalos
Mariam Thalos*
Affiliation:
State University of New York at Buffalo
*
†Philosophy Department, 607 Baldy Hall, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260–1010; e-mail [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I shall introduce the units of decision problem in the theory of decision, which as I shall explain is a sibling to the units of selection problem in evolutionary theory. And I shall present an argument to the effect that, contrary to Bayesian wisdom on the subject, undertaking decision in group settings (in multi-individual units) violates no precepts of rationality.

Type
Philosophy of Social Science
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 66 , Issue S3: Supplement. Proceedings of the 1998 Biennial Meetings of the Philosophy of Science Association. Part I: Contributed Papers Sep., 1999 , 1999 , pp. S324 - S338
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

Special thanks to Robert Goodin for helpful reactions to initial ideas, as well as for the impetus to shape them. And, as always, thanks to Barry Smith for useful dissent.

References

Boyd, R. and Richerson, P. (1985), Culture and the Evolutionary Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Buchanan, James (1987), “Constitutional Economics”, in Eatwell, J., Milgate, M., and Newman, P. (eds.), The New Palgrave: Utility and Probability. New York: W. W. Norton, 585–588.Google Scholar
Buchanan, James, Wagner, R., and Burton, J. (1978), The Consequences of Mr. Keynes. London: Institute for Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
Cavalli-Sforza, L. and Feldman, M. (1981), Cultural Transmission and Evolution: A Quantitative Approach. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Cosmides, L. and Tooby, J. (eds.) (1992), The Adapted Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Farber, D. and Frickey, P. (1991), Law and Public Choice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, R. (1982), Collective Action. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Harsanyi, J. (1975), “The Tracing Procedure: A Bayesian Approach to Defining a Solution for n-person Non-cooperative Games”, International Journal of Game Theory 4: 61–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harsanyi, J. and Selten, R. (1988), A General Theory of Equilibrium Selection in Games. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kincaid, H. (1995), “The Empirical Presuppositions of Metaphysical Explanations in Microeconomics”, Monist 78: 368–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, S. and Moresi, S., “Pure and Utilitarian Prisoner's Dilemmas”, Economics and Philosophy 11: 333–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parfit, D. (1986), “Prudence, Morality and the Prisoner's Dilemma' “, in Elster, Jon (ed.), Rational Choice. New York: New York University Press, 34–59.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, A. (1995), “The Metaphysics of Microeconomics”, Monist 78: 352–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, B. (1954), Human Society in Ethics and Politics. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Schelling, T. (1962), Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1974), “Choice, Ordering and Morality,” in Korner, S. (ed.), Practical Reason. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 54–67.Google Scholar
Simon, H. (1983), Reason in Human Affairs. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Skyrms, Brian (1990), The Dynamics of Rational Deliberation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thalos, M. (forthcoming), “Degrees of Freedom in the Social World”, Journal of Political Philosophy.Google Scholar