Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T00:27:29.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Understanding Leopold’s Concept of “Interdependence” for Environmental Ethics and Conservation Biology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Roberta L. Millstein
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Aldo Leopold’s land ethic, an extremely influential view in environmental ethics and conservation biology, is committed to the claim that interdependence between humans, other species, and abiotic entities plays a central role in our ethical responsibilities. Thus, a robust understanding of “interdependence” is necessary for evaluating the viability of the land ethic and related views, including ecological ones. I characterize and defend a Leopoldian concept of “interdependence,” arguing that it ought to include both negative and positive causal relations. I also show that strength and type of interdependence can vary with time, space, and context.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 85 , Issue 5 , December 2018 , pp. 1127 - 1139
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

Thanks to Chris Eliot, Alkistis Elliott-Graves, Curt Meine, Steve Peck, Tami Schneider, Julianne Warren, and the Griesemer/Millstein Lab for helpful comments.

References

Anstett, Marie-Charlotte, Hossaert-McKey, Martine, and McKey, Doyle. 1997. “Modeling the Persistence of Small Populations of Strongly Interdependent Species: Figs and Fig Wasps.” Conservation Biology 11 (1): 204–13..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beschta, Robert L., and Ripple, William J.. 2012. “Berry-Producing Shrub Characteristics following Wolf Reintroduction in Yellowstone National Park.” Forest Ecology and Management 276:132–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooker, Rob W., and Callaghan, Terry V.. 1998. “The Balance between Positive and Negative Plant Interactions and Its Relationship to Environmental Gradients: A Model.” Oikos 81 (1): 196–207..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Commoner, Barry. 1971. The Closing Circle: Nature, Man, and Technology. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Craige, Betty Jean. 2002. Eugene Odum: Ecosystem Ecologist and Environmentalist. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Eliot, Christopher H. 2011. “The Legend of Order and Chaos: Communities and Early Community Ecology.” In Handbook of the Philosophy of Science: Philosophy of Ecology, ed. deLaplante, Kevin, Brown, Bryson, and Peacock, Kent A., 49–108. Oxford: North-Holland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harley, C. D. G., and Bertness, M. D.. 1996. “Structural Interdependence: An Ecological Consequence of Morphological Responses to Crowding in Marsh Plants.” Functional Ecology 10:654–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoek, Tim A., Axelrod, Kevin, Biancalani, Tommaso, Yurtsev, Eugene A., Liu, Jinghui, and Gore, Jeff. 2016. “Resource Availability Modulates the Cooperative and Competitive Nature of a Microbial Cross-Feeding Mutualism.” PLoS Biology 14 (8): e1002540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katz, Eric. 1996. Nature as Subject: Human Obligation and Natural Community. London: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Laundré, John W., Hernández, Lucina, and Ripple, William J.. 2010. “The Landscape of Fear: Ecological Implications of Being Afraid.” Open Ecology Journal 3:1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leopold, Aldo. 1941. “Conservation of Natural Resources.” The Aldo Leopold Archives, Lectures 1933–1947:949–50. Digital Collections, University of Wisconsin–Madison Library. http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1711.dl/AldoLeopold.Google Scholar
Leopold, Aldo 1942. “The Role of Wildlife in a Liberal Education.” In Transactions of the Seventh North American Wildlife Conference, 485–89. Washington, DC: American Wildlife Institute.Google Scholar
Leopold, Aldo 1942/1991. “Land-Use and Democracy.” In The River of the Mother of God and Other Essays by Aldo Leopold, ed. Flader, Susan L. and Callicott, J. Baird, 295–300. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Leopold, Aldo 1942/1999. “Biotic Land Use.” In Aldo Leopold: For the Health of the Land: Previously Unpublished Essays and Other Writings, ed. Callicott, J. Baird and Freyfogle, Eric T., 198–207. Washington, DC: Island.Google Scholar
Leopold, Aldo 1943. “Deer Irruptions.” Transactions of the Wisconsin Academy of Sciences, Arts, and Letters 35:351–66.Google Scholar
Leopold, Aldo 1949. A Sand County Almanac and Sketches Here and There. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McShane, Katie. 2004. “Ecosystem Health.” Environmental Ethics 26 (3): 227–45..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meine, Curt. 2010. Aldo Leopold: His Life and Work. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Millstein, Roberta L. 2013. “Natural Selection and Causal Productivity.” In Mechanism and Causality in Biology and Economics, ed. Chao, Hsiang-Ke, Chen, Szu-Ting, and Millstein, Roberta L., 147–63. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Millstein, Roberta L. 2015. “Re-examining the Darwinian Basis for Aldo Leopold’s Land Ethic.” Ethics, Policy and Environment 18:301–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millstein, Roberta L. Forthcoming. “Is Aldo Leopold’s ‘Land Community’ an Individual?” In Individuation across Experimental and Theoretical Sciences, ed. Otávio Bueno, Ruey-Lin Chen, and Melinda B. Fagan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Molles, Manuel C. 2015. Ecology: Concepts and Applications. Vol. 7. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Odenbaugh, Jay. 2010. “On the Very Idea of an Ecosystem.” In New Waves in Metaphysics, ed. Hazlett, Allan, 240–58. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Odum, Eugene. P. 1971. Fundamentals of Ecology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
Ouderkirk, Wayne. 2002. “Introduction: Callicott and Environmental Philosophy.” In Land, Value, Community: Callicott and Environmental Philosophy, ed. Ouderkirk, Wayne and Hill, Jim, 1–18. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Alexis P., Bird, Douglas W., and Perry, George H.. 2017. “Human Behaviour as a Long-Term Ecological Driver of Non-human Evolution.” Nature Ecology and Evolution 1, art. 0065.Google Scholar
Taylor, Paul. 1981. “The Ethics of Respect for Nature.” Environmental Ethics 3:197–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Jeremy A., Simcox, D. J., and Clarke, Ralph T.. 2009. “Successful Conservation of a Threatened Maculinea Butterfly.” Science 325 (5936): 80–83..CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valiente-Banuet, Alfonso, Ramírez, Elia, Verdú, Miguel, and Miramontes, Pedro. 2014. “Plant Community Ecology.” In Frontiers in Ecology, Evolution and Complexity, ed. Benítez, Mariana, Miramontes, Octavio, and Valiente-Banuet, Alfonso. Ciudad de México: CopIt ArXives.Google Scholar
Van Dyke, Fred. 2008. Conservation Biology: Foundations, Concepts, Applications. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, Julianne Lutz. 2013. Aldo Leopold’s Odyssey: Rediscovering the Author of a Sand County Almanac. Washington, DC: Island.Google Scholar
Young, Christian C. 2002. In the Absence of Predators: Conservation and Controversy on the Kaibab Plateau. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar