Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:31:05.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two Notions of Ecological Function

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2022

Antoine C. Dussault
Antoine C. Dussault*
Affiliation:
Collège Lionel-Groulx, Sainte-Thérèse, Québec, Canada, Centre interuniversitaire de recherche sur la science et la technologie (CIRST), Montréal, Québec, Canada
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper discusses Millstein’s (2020) criticism of the consensus view formed against selected-effects ecological functions. I argue that Millstein’s defense of coevolution-based selected-effects ecological functions applies to a notion of function as an activity, whereas proponents of the consensus view are concerned with a notion of ecological function as the contribution of an organism, population, species, or abiotic item to the maintenance of its community and/or the functioning of its ecosystem. Millstein’s arguments hence do not invalidate the consensus view but draw attention to a notion of function that has been neglected in philosophical discussions and that deserves more attention.

Type
Discussion Note
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 89 , Issue 1 , January 2022 , pp. 171 - 179
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The author is thankful to Roberta Millstein for a stimulating exchange on ecological functions, as well as to her, Justin Garson and two anonymous referees for helpful comments on previous versions of this manuscript. He also thanks Xander Selene and Alice Everly for editing the manuscript. The work for this paper was supported by a research grant from the Fonds de recherche du Québec – Société et culture (FRQSC, 2018-CH-211053).

References

Agosta, Salvatore J., and Klemens, Jeffrey A.. 2008. “Ecological Fitting by Phenotypically Flexible Genotypes: Implications for Species Associations, Community Assembly and Evolution.” Ecology Letters 11 (11):1123–34.10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01237.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bigelow, John, and Robert, Pargetter. 1987. “Functions.” Journal of Philosophy 84 (4):181–96.10.2307/2027157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blondel, Jacques. 2003. “Guilds or Functional Groups: Does It Matter?” Oikos 100 (2):223–31.10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12152.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colwell, Robert K. 1992. “Niche: A Bifurcation in the Conceptual Lineage of the Term.” In Keywords in Evolutionary Biology, ed. Keller, Evelyn Fox, and Lloyd, Elisabeth, 241–48. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cummins, Robert C. 1975. “Functional Analysis.” Journal of Philosophy 72 (20):741–64.10.2307/2024640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dussault, Antoine C. 2018. “Functional Ecology’s Non-Selectionist Understanding of Function.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 70:1–9.10.1016/j.shpsc.2018.05.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dussault, Antoine C., and Bouchard, Frédéric. 2017. “A Persistence Enhancing Propensity Account of Ecological Function to Explain Ecosystem Evolution.” Synthese 194 (4):1115–45.10.1007/s11229-016-1065-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garson, Justin. 2016. A Critical Overview of Biological Functions . SpringerBriefs in Philosophy. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
Garson, Justin. 2017. “A Generalized Selected Effects Theory of Function.” Philosophy of Science 84 (3):523–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gayon, Jean. 2010. “Raisonnement fonctionnel et niveaux d’organisation en biologie.” In Les fonctions: des organismes aux artefacts, ed. Gayon, Jean, and de Ricqlès, Armand, 125–38. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Hooper, D. U., Solan, M., Symstad, A., Diaz, S., Gessner, M. O., Buchmann, N., Degrange, V., et al. 2002. “Species Diversity, Functional Diversity and Ecosystem Functioning.” In Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning: Synthesis and Perspectives, ed. Loreau, Michel, Naeem, Shahid, and Inchausti, Pablo, 195–208. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hull, David L. 1987. “Genealogical Actors in Ecological Roles.” Biology and Philosophy 2 (2):168–84.Google Scholar
Jax, Kurt. 2005. “Function and ‘Functioning’ in Ecology: What Does It Mean?” Oikos 111 (3):641–48.10.1111/j.1600-0706.2005.13851.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavorel, S., and Garnier, E.. 2002. “Predicting Changes in Community Composition and Ecosystem Functioning from Plant Traits: Revisiting the Holy Grail.” Functional Ecology 16 (5):545–56.10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00664.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lean, Christopher Hunter. 2020. “Invasive Species and Natural Function in Ecology.” Synthese 198 (10):9315-33.10.1007/s11229-020-02635-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewens, Tim. 2007. “Functions.” In Philosophy of Biology, ed. Matthen, Mohan, and Stephens, Christopher, 525–47. Amsterdam: Elsevier.10.1016/B978-044451543-8/50024-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maclaurin, James, and Kim, Sterelny. 2008. What Is Biodiversity? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millikan, Ruth G. 1989. “In Defense of Proper Functions.” Philosophy of Science 56:288–302.10.1086/289488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millstein, Roberta. 2020. “Functions and Functioning in Aldo Leopold’s Land Ethic and in Ecology.” Philosophy of Science 87 (5):1107–18.10.1086/710619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mossio, Matteo, Cristian, Saborido, and Alvaro, Moreno. 2009. “An Organizational Account of Biological Functions.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (4):813–41.10.1093/bjps/axp036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naeem, Shahid. 2002. “Functional Biodiversity.” In Encyclopedia of Global Environmental Change, ed. Harold, A. Mooney, and Josep, G. Canadell, 20–36. Chichester; Rexdale, Ont.: Wiley.Google Scholar
Neander, Karen. 1991. “The Teleological Notion of ‘Function.’” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69 (4):454–68.10.1080/00048409112344881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunes-Neto, Nei, Alvaro, Moreno, and El-Hani, Charbel N.. 2014. “Function in Ecology: An Organizational Approach.” Biology and Philosophy 29 (1):123–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odenbaugh, Jay. 2010. “On the Very Idea of an Ecosystem.” In New Waves in Metaphysics, ed. Hazlett, Allan, 240–58. Basingstoke, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Odum, Eugene P. 1971. Fundamentals of Ecology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, London, Toronto: W. B. Saunders Company.Google Scholar
Root, Richard B. 1967. “The Niche Exploitation Pattern of the Blue-Gray Gnatcatcher.” Ecological Monographs 37 (4):317–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulze, E.-D., and Mooney, Harold A.. 1993. “Ecosystem Function of Biodiversity: A Summary.” In Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function, ed. Schulze, E.-D, and Harold, A. Mooney, 497–510. Berlin; New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simberloff, Daniel, and Dayan, T.. 1991. “The Guild Concept and the Structure of Ecological Communities.” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 22 (1):115–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, Elliott. 1984. The Nature of Selection: Evolutionary Theory in Philosophical Focus. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Satgé, Jacques de, Kristine, Teichman, and Bogdan, Cristescu. 2017. “Competition and Coexistence in a Small Carnivore Guild.” Oecologia 184 (4):873–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterelny, Kim. 2001. “Darwin’s Tangled Bank.” In The Evolution of Agency and Other Essays, 152–78. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stroud, James T., Bush, Michael R., Ladd, Mark C., Nowicki, Robert J., Shantz, Andrew A., and Jennifer, Sweatman. 2015. “Is a Community Still a Community? Reviewing Definitions of Key Terms in Community Ecology.” Ecology and Evolution 5 (21):4757–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, John N. 1994. The Coevolutionary Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, John N. 2005. The Geographic Mosaic of Coevolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornhill, Ian A., Jeremy, Biggs, Hill, Matthew J., Robert, Briers, David, Gledhill, Wood, Paul J., Gee, John H. R., Mark, Ledger, and Christopher, Hassall. 2018. “The Functional Response and Resilience in Small Waterbodies along Land-Use and Environmental Gradients.” Global Change Biology 24 (7):3079–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wouters, Arno. 2003. “Four Notions of Biological Function.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 34 (4):633–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wouters, Arno. 2005. “The Function Debate in Philosophy.” Acta Biotheoretica 53 (2):123–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, Larry. 1973. “Functions.” Philosophical Review 82 (2):139–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar