Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T15:21:35.852Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Toward a Clarification of Grünbaum's Conception of an Intrinsic Metric

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Gerald J. Massey
Gerald J. Massey*
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Much of Grünbaum's work may be regarded as a careful development and systematic elaboration of the Riemann–Poincaré thesis of the conventionality of congruence, the thesis that the continuous manifolds of space, time, and space-time are intrinsically metrically amorphous, i.e. are devoid of intrinsic metrics. Therefore, to appreciate Grünbaum's philosophical contributions, one must have a clear understanding of what he means by an intrinsic metric. The second and fourth sections of this paper are exegetical; in them we try to piece together, from his sundry remarks about intrinsic metrics, what Grünbaum means by the term ‘intrinsic metric.’ We shall argue that, the customary carefulness and precision of Grünbaum's writings notwithstanding, there are residual unclarities and difficulties which beset his conception of an intrinsic metric. In the fifth section we shall propose an explication of Grünbaum's notion of an intrinsic metric which seems on the whole faithful to Grünbaum's intuitions and insights and which also seems capable of performing the philosophical services which his work demands of that notion. The third section is a digression on Zeno's metrical paradox of extension.

Type
A Panel Discussion of Grünbaum's Philosophy of Science
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 36 , Issue 4 , December 1969 , pp. 331 - 345
Copyright
Copyright © 1969 by The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

Professor Grünbaum's response to the Panel Discussants will appear in a future issue of this journal.

References

[1] Adler, I., A New Look at Geometry, Signet Science Books, New York, 1966Google Scholar
[2] Ayres, F. Jr., Theory and Problems of Modern Algebra, Schaum Publishing Co., New York, 1965.Google Scholar
[3] Dedekind, R., Essays on the Theory of Numbers, Dover Publications, New York, 1963.Google Scholar
[4] Ellis, B., Basic Concepts of Measurement, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1966.Google Scholar
[5] Grünbaum, A., “A Consistent Conception of the Extended Linear Continuum as an Aggregate of Unextended Elements,” Philosophy of Science, vol. 19 (1952), pp. 288–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Grünbaum, A., Geometry and Chronometry in Philosophical Perspective, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1968.Google Scholar
[7] Grünbaum, A., “Geometry, Chronometry, and Empiricism” in Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 3 (1962), pp. 405–526.Google Scholar
[8] Grünbaum, A., “Modern Science and the Refutation of the Paradoxes of Zeno,” Scientific Monthly, vol. 81 (1955), pp. 234–239.Google Scholar
[9] Grünbaum, A., Modern Science and Zeno's Paradoxes, Wesleyan University Press, Middletown, 1967.Google Scholar
[10] Grünbaum, A., Philosophical Problems of Space and Time, Alfred A. Knopf, Inc., New York, 1963.Google Scholar
[11] Grünbaum, A., “Reply to Hilary Putnam's ‘An Examination of Grünbaum's Philosophy of Geometry,'” Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 5 (1968), pp. 1–150.Google Scholar
[12] Halmos, P. R., Measure Theory, Van Nostrand Co., Princeton, 1950.10.1007/978-1-4684-9440-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13] Hobson, E. W., The Theory of Functions of a Real Variable, Dover Publications, New York, 1957.Google Scholar
[14] Huntington, E. V., The Continuum and Other Types of Serial Order, Dover Publications, New York, 1955.Google Scholar
[15] Lipschutz, S., General Topology, Schaum Publishing Co., New York, 1965.Google Scholar
[16] Massey, G. J., The Philosophy of Space, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Princeton University, 1963.Google Scholar
[17] Moise, E., Elementary Geometry from an Advanced Standpoint, Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, 1963.Google Scholar
[18] Riemann, B. “Ueber die Hypothesen, welche der Geometrie zu Grunde liegen,” Collected Works of Bernhard Riemann, Dover Publications, New York, 1953, pp. 272–287.Google Scholar
[19] Russell, B., Our Knowledge of the External World, Mentor Books, New York, 1960.Google Scholar