Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:12:36.711Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Three Perspectives on Neutrality and Drift in Molecular Evolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Michael R. Dietrich
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article offers three contrasting cases of the use of neutrality and drift in molecular evolution. In the first, neutrality is assumed as a simplest case for modeling. In the second and third, concepts of drift and neutrality are developed within the context of population genetics testing and the development and application of the molecular clock.

Type
Case Studies on Chance in Evolution
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 73 , Issue 5: Proceedings of the 2004 Biennial Meeting of The Philosophy of Science Association. Part II: Symposia Papers. Edited by Miriam Solomon , December 2006 , pp. 666 - 677
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ayala, Francisco, Tracey, Martin, Barr, Lorraine, McDonald, John, and Perez-Salas, Santiago (1974), “Genetic Variation in Natural Populations of Five Drosophila Species and the Hypothesis of the Selective Neutrality of Protein Polymorphisms,” Genetics 77:343–384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beatty, J. (1995), “The Evolutionary Contingency Thesis,” in Wolters, G. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Concepts, Theories, and Rationality in the Biological Sciences. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 45–81.Google Scholar
Crow, James F. (1969), “Molecular Genetics and Population Genetics,” Proceedings of the Twelfth International Congress of Genetics 3:105–113.Google Scholar
Crow, James F. (1985), “The Neutralist-Selectionist Controversy in the History of Evolution and Population Genetics,” in Ohta, T. and Aoki, K. (eds.), Population Genetics and Molecular Evolution. Tokyo: Japan Scientific Society Press.Google Scholar
Crow, James F. (1989), “Twenty-Five Years Ago in Genetics: The Infinite Alleles Model,” Genetics 121:631–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietrich, Michael R. (1994), “The Origins of the Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution,” Journal of the History of Biology 27:21–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dietrich, Michael R. (1998), “Paradox and Persuasion: Negotiating the Place of Molecular Evolution within Evolutionary Biology,” Journal of the History of Biology 31:85–111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dobzhanksy, Theodosius. (1955), “A Review of Some Fundamental Concepts and Problems in Population Genetics,” Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 20:1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, John (1991), The Causes of Molecular Evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, Morris, Moore, G., and Matsuda, G. (1975), “Darwinian Evolution in the Genealogy of Hemoglobin,” Nature 253:603–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagen, Joel (1999), “Naturalists, Molecular Biologists, and the Challenges of Molecular Evolution,” Journal of the History of Biology 32:321–341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kimura, Motoo (1957), “Some Problems of Stochastic Processes in Genetics,” Annals of Mathematical Statistics 28:882–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimura, Motoo (1968), “Evolutionary Rate at the Molecular Level,” Nature 217:624–626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kimura, Motoo (1983), The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimura, Motoo (1985), “Genes, Populations, and Molecules: A Memoir,” in Ohta, T. and Aoki, K. (eds.), Population Genetics and Molecular Evolution. Tokyo: Japan Scientific Society Press.Google Scholar
Kimura, Motoo, and Crow, James (1964), “The Number of Alleles That Can Be Maintained in a Finite Population,” Genetics 49:725–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimura, Motoo, and Ohta, Tomoko (1971), “Protein Polymorphism as a Phase in Molecular Evolution,” Nature 229:467–469.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, J. (1976) “Progress in the Neutral Mutation Random Drift Controversy,” Federation Proceedings 35:2087–2091.Google ScholarPubMed
King, J., and Jukes, Thomas (1969), “Non-Darwinian Evolution,” Science 164:788–798.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kreitman, Martin (2000), ”Methods to Detect Selection in Populations with Application to the Human,” Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 1:539–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langley, Charles, and Fitch, Walter (1974), “An Examination of the Constancy of the Rate of Molecular Evolution,” Journal of Molecular Evolution 3:161–177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Millstein, Roberta (2002), “Are Random Drift and Natural Selection Conceptually Distinct?” Biology and Philosophy 17:33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Greg (1998), “Emile Zuckerkandl, Linus Pauling, and the Molecular Evolutionary Clock, 1959–1965,” Journal of the History of Biology 31:155–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohta, Tomoko, and Gillespie, John (1996), “Development of Neutral and Nearly Neutral Theories,” Theoretical Population Biology 49:128–142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ohta, Tomoko, and Kimura, Motoo (1971), “On the Constancy of the Evolutionary Rate of Cistrons,” Journal of Molecular Evolution 1:18–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stebbin, G. L., and Lewontin, R. C. (1972), “Comparative Evolution at the Level of Molecules, Organisms, and Populations,” in LeCam, L. et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics, Vol. 5, Darwinian, Neo-Darwinian, and Non-Darwinian Evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press, 23–42.Google Scholar
Takahata, N. (1987), “On the Overdispersed Molecular Clock,” Genetics 116:169–179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, Allan, Carlson, S., and White, T. (1977), “Biochemical Evolution,” Annual Review of Biochemistry 46:573–639.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, Allan, Ochman, H., and Prager, E. (1987), “Molecular Time Scale for Evolution,” Trends in Genetics 3:241–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuckerkandl, Emile, and Pauling, Linus (1965), “Evolutionary Divergence and Convergence in Proteins,” in Bryson, V. and Vogel, H. (eds.), Evolving Genes and Proteins. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar