Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:56:48.871Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Teleology and Mechanism: M. Grene's Absurdity Argument

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Desmond M. Clark*
Affiliation:
University College

Extract

Marjorie Grene has argued in a number of contexts (1971, 1974, 1976) that any attempt to reduce the explanation of human actions to “mechanistic” explanations is doomed to failure in advance because it is absurd. “This argument examines the status of the reductivist thesis in its own terms and reduces it to absurdity …” (1971, p. 55); “the attempt to reduce human purposive, or ‘intentional,‘ action to physiology and ultimately to physics and chemistry is an absurdity rather than simply a confusion” (1976, p. 183). I wish to show that this argument is fallacious because it involves a petitio principii; and if Plato can be credited with introducing the same argument in the Theaetetus, as she suggests, so much the worse for Plato.

Type
Discussion
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gaa, James (1975), “The Replacement of Scientific Theories: Reduction and Explication.Philosophy of Science, 42, 349–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grene, Marjorie (1971), “Reducibility: Another Side Issue,” in Marjorie Grene, (ed.) Interpretations of Life and Mind, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 14–37; reprinted in (Grene 1974), pp. 5373.Google Scholar
Grene, Marjorie (1974), The Understanding of Nature. Holland: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grene, Marjorie (1976), “To Have a Mind …Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 1: 177–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maull, Nancy L. (1977), “Unifying Science without Reduction.Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 8, 143–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodfield, Andrew (1976), Teleology. Cambridge: Cambridge U.P.Google Scholar