Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T18:37:57.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Taking Absurd Theories Seriously: Economics and the Case of Rational Addiction Theories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Ole Rogeberg
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Rational addiction theories illustrate how absurd choice theories in economics get taken seriously as possibly true explanations and tools for welfare analysis despite being poorly interpreted, empirically unfalsifiable, and based on wildly inaccurate assumptions selectively justified by ad-hoc stories. The lack of transparency introduced by poorly anchored mathematical models, the psychological persuasiveness of stories, and the way the profession neglects relevant issues are suggested as explanations for how what we perhaps should see as displays of technical skill and ingenuity are allowed to blur the lines between science and games.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 71 , Issue 3 , July 2004 , pp. 263 - 285
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

This work was financed by the Norwegian Research Council through a Ph. D. grant from HERO (Health Economics Research Programme at the University of Oslo). Thanks to two anonymous referees, my thesis supervisors (Professors Michael Hoel and Aanund Hylland at the University of Oslo) and Morten Nordberg for comments.

References

Adda, Jérôme, and Lechene, Valérie (2001), Smoking and Endogenous Mortality: Does Heterogeneity in Life Expectancy Explain Differences in Smoking Behaviour? Discussion Paper 77, Department of Economics Oxford: University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary S. (1996), “Preferences and Values”, in Accounting for Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Gary S., and Mulligan, Casey B. (1997), “The Endogenous Determination of Time Preference”, The Endogenous Determination of Time Preference 112(3): 729–758.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary S., and Murphy, Kevin M. (1988), “A Theory of Rational Addiction”, A Theory of Rational Addiction 96(4): 675–700.Google Scholar
Chaloupka, Frank J., and Warner, Kenneth E. (2000), “The Economics of Smoking”, in Handbook of Health Economics, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1539–1627.Google Scholar
Chick, Victoria (1998), “On Knowing One's Place: The Role of Formalism in Economics”, On Knowing One's Place: The Role of Formalism in Economics 108(November): 1859–1869.Google Scholar
Covey, Stephen R., Merrill, A. Roger, and Merrill, Rebecca R. ([1994] 2003), First Things First, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Cowen, Tyler (1989), “Are All Tastes Constant and Identical? A Critique of Stigler and Becker”, Are All Tastes Constant and Identical? A Critique of Stigler and Becker 11(1): 127–135.Google Scholar
Dawes, Robyn M. (1999), “A Message from Psychologists to Economists: Mere Predictability Doesn't Matter Like It Should (without a Good Story Appended to It)”, A Message from Psychologists to Economists: Mere Predictability Doesn't Matter Like It Should (without a Good Story Appended to It) 39:29–40.Google Scholar
Dockner, Engelbert J., and Feichtinger, Gustav (1993), “Cyclical Consumption Patterns and Rational Addiction”, Cyclical Consumption Patterns and Rational Addiction 83(1): 256–263.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon (1997), “More Than Enough”, review of Accounting for Tastes, by Gary S. Becker. University of Chicago Law Review 64(2): 749–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon (ed.) (1999a), Addiction: Entries and Exits. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon (1999b), Strong Feelings: Emotion, Addiction, and Human Behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon (2000a), Alchemies of the Mind: Rationality and the Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon (2000b), Ulysses Unbound: Studies in Rationality, Precommitment, and Constraints. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon, and Skog, Ole-Jørgen (eds.) (1999), Getting Hooked: Rationality and Addiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, Ernst, and Zych, Peter K. (1998), “Do Addicts Behave Rationally?” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 100(3): 643–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feichtinger, Gustav, Hommes, Cars H., and Milik, Alexandra (1997), “Chaotic Consumption Patterns in a Simple 2-D Addiction Model”, Chaotic Consumption Patterns in a Simple 2-D Addiction Model 10(1): 147–173.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Brian S. (2000), “Interpreting the Rational Addiction Model”, Interpreting the Rational Addiction Model 9:587–598.Google ScholarPubMed
Friedman, Milton (1953), “The Methodology of Positive Economics”, in Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 3–43.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton, and Savage, Leonard J. (1952), “The Expected-Utility Hypothesis and the Measurability of Utility”, The Expected-Utility Hypothesis and the Measurability of Utility 60(6): 463–474.Google Scholar
Gibbard, Allan, and Varian, Hal R. (1978), “Economic Models”, Economic Models 75(11): 664–677.Google Scholar
Godtfredsen, Nina S., Holst, Claus, Prescott, Eva, Vestbo, Jørgen, and Osler, Merete (2002), “Smoking Reduction, Smoking Cessation, and Mortality: A 16-Year Follow-up of 19,732 Men and Women from the Copenhagen Centre for Prospective Population Studies”, Smoking Reduction, Smoking Cessation, and Mortality: A 16-Year Follow-up of 19,732 Men and Women from the Copenhagen Centre for Prospective Population Studies 156(11): 994–1001.Google Scholar
Hausman, Daniel M. (1992), The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, Paul (1998), “Two Cheers for Formalism”, Two Cheers for Formalism 108(November): 1829–1836.Google Scholar
Kukla, Andre (1991), “Criteria of Rationality and the Problem of Logical Sloth”, Criteria of Rationality and the Problem of Logical Sloth 58(3): 486–490.Google Scholar
Laibson, David (2001), “A Cue-Theory of Consumption”, A Cue-Theory of Consumption 116(1): 81–119.Google Scholar
Leffondré, Karen, Abrahamowicz, Michal, Siemiatycki, Jack, and Rachet, Bernard (2002), “Modeling Smoking History: A Comparison of Different Approaches”, Modeling Smoking History: A Comparison of Different Approaches 156(9): 813–823.Google ScholarPubMed
Levine, Harry G. (2000), review of “Getting Hooked: Rationality and Addiction”, Getting Hooked: Rationality and Addiction 95(3): 449–452.Google Scholar
Loewenstein, George, and Adler, Daniel (1995), “A Bias in the Prediction of Tastes”, A Bias in the Prediction of Tastes 105(431): 929–937.Google Scholar
Miron, Jeffrey A., and Zwiebel, Jeffrey (1995), “The Economic Case against Drug Prohibition”, The Economic Case against Drug Prohibition 9(4): 175–192.Google Scholar
Orphanides, Athanasios, and Zervos, David (1995), “Rational Addiction with Learning and Regret”, Rational Addiction with Learning and Regret 103(4): 739–758.Google Scholar
Orphanides, Athanasios, and Zervos, David (1998), “Myopia and Addictive Behaviour”, Myopia and Addictive Behaviour 108(446): 75–91.Google Scholar
Rogeberg, Ole (2003), “Preferences, Rationality and Welfare in Becker's Extended Utility Approach”, Preferences, Rationality and Welfare in Becker's Extended Utility Approach 15(3): 283–323.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Alexander (1979), “Can Economic Theory Explain Everything?” Philosophy of Social Science 9:509–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, Alexander (1981), Sociobiology and the Preemption of Social Science, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Alexander (1992), Economics—Mathematical Politics or Science of Diminishing Returns, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. (1979), “Rational Decision Making in Business Organizations”, Rational Decision Making in Business Organizations 69(4): 493–513.Google Scholar
Skog, Ole-Jørgen (1999), “Rationality, Irrationality and Addiction- Notes on Becker and Murphy's Theory of Addiction”, in Elster, J. and Skog, O. J. (eds.), Getting Hooked. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 173–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trout, J.D. (2002), “Scientific Explanation and the Sense of Understanding”, Scientific Explanation and the Sense of Understanding 69:212–233.Google Scholar
Winston, Gordon C. (1980), “Addiction and Backsliding - a Theory of Compulsive Consumption”, Addiction and Backsliding - a Theory of Compulsive Consumption 1:295–324.Google Scholar