Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:27:52.078Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Systems Theory and Evolutionary Models of the Development of Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

James A. Blachowicz
James A. Blachowicz*
Affiliation:
Youngstown State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Philosophers of science have used various formulations of the “random mutation—natural selection” scheme to explain the development of scientific knowledge. But the uncritical acceptance of this evolutionary model has led to substantive problems concerning the relation between fact and theory. The primary difficulty lies in the fact that those who adopt this model (Popper and Kuhn, for example) are led to claim that theories arise chiefly through the processes of relatively random change. Systems theory constitutes a general criticism of this model insofar as it demonstrates the necessity of supplementing this mechanism with the non-random influences exercised by the internal organization of a system on its own development.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 38 , Issue 2 , June 1971 , pp. 178 - 199
Copyright
Copyright © 1971 by The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Aristotle, Posterior Analytics, many editions. Especially Bk. II, Ch. 19.Google Scholar
[2] Ashby, W. Ross, An Introduction to Cybernetics, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1963.Google Scholar
[3] Ashby, W. Ross, “Principles of the Self-Organizing System,” in Principles of Self-Organization, (eds., von Foerster, Heinz and Zopf, George W.), Pergamon Press, New York, 1962. Reprinted in Walter Buckley (ed.), Modern Systems Research for the Behavioral Scientist, Aldine, Chicago, 1968.Google Scholar
[4] Bertalanffy, Ludwig von, Robots, Men, and Minds, George Braziller, New York, 1967.Google Scholar
[5] Bonsack, François, Information, thermodynamique, vie et pensée, Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1961.Google Scholar
[6] Braithwaite, R. B., Scientific Explanation, Harper Torchbook, New York, 1960.Google Scholar
[7] Campbell, D. T., “Methodological Suggestions From a Comparative Psychology of Knowledge Processes,” Inquiry, vol. 2, 1959.10.1080/00201745908601293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Gerard, R. W., “Units and Concepts of Biology,” Science, 125 (1957). Reprinted in Buckley (see note 3).10.1126/science.125.3245.429CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[9] Hall, A. D. and Gagen, R. E., “Definition of System,” revised introductory chapter of Systems Engineering, Bell Telephone Laboratories, New York. Reprinted in Buckley (see note 3) from General Systems, I (1956).Google Scholar
[10] Hanson, N. R., Patterns of Discovery, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1965.Google Scholar
[11] Holton, G., “On the Duality and Growth of Physical Science,” American Scientist, 41, 89 (1953).Google Scholar
[12] Khailov, K. M., “The Problem of Systemic Organization in Theoretical Biology,” trans. by Anatol Rapoport in General Systems, IX (1964). Reprinted in Buckley (see reference 3).Google Scholar
[13] Kuhn, T. S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, The University of Chicago Press, 1962. Second edition, enlarged, 1970.Google Scholar
[14] Lange, O., Wholes and Parts, A General Theory of System Behavior, trans. by Eugeniusz Lepa, Polish Scientific Publishers, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1965.Google Scholar
[15] Mure, G. R. G., An Introduction to Hegel, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1940.Google Scholar
[16] Popper, K. R., The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Basic Books, New York, 1959.Google Scholar
[17] Shapere, Dudley, Philosophical Problems of Natural Science, Introduction, Macmillan, New York, 1965.Google Scholar
[18] Shapere, D., review of T. S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (note 13), The Philosophical Review, LXXIII, Vol. 3; July, 1964.Google Scholar
[19] Whitehead, A. N., Process and Reality, Macmillan, New York, 1929.Google Scholar
[20] Whitehead, A. N., Symbolism, Its Meaning and Effect, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1958.Google Scholar
[21] Whyte, L. L., Internal Factors in Evolution, George Braziller, New York, 1965.10.1063/1.3046950CrossRefGoogle Scholar