Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:42:08.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Symmetry and Its Formalisms: Mathematical Aspects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Alexandre Guay  and
Brian Hepburn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article explores the relation between the concept of symmetry and its formalisms. The standard view among philosophers and physicists is that symmetry is completely formalized by mathematical groups. For some mathematicians however, the groupoid is a competing and more general formalism. An analysis of symmetry that justifies this extension has not been adequately spelled out. After a brief explication of how groups, equivalence, and symmetries classes are related, we show that, while it's true in some instances that groups are too restrictive, there are other instances for which the standard extension to groupoids is too unrestrictive. The connection between groups and equivalence classes, when generalized to groupoids, suggests a middle ground between the two.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 76 , Issue 2 , April 2009 , pp. 160 - 178
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

Previous versions of this article were presented at the University of Pittsburgh and at the École Normale Supérieure (Paris). Thanks to the members of those audiences for their comments and questions and especially to John Earman and Gordon Belot. Guay's work was supported by a postdoctoral grant form the Fonds de Recherche sur la Société et la Culture du Québec (Canada).

References

Brading, Katherine, and Castellani, Elena, eds. (2003), Symmetries in Physics: Philosophical Reflections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Ronald (1987), “From Groups to Groupoids: A Brief Survey”, From Groups to Groupoids: A Brief Survey 19:113–134.Google Scholar
Castellani, Elena (2003), “Symmetry and Equivalence”, in Brading, Katherine and Castellani, Elena (eds.), Symmetries in Physics: Philosophical Reflections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 425–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connes, Alain (1994), Noncommutative Geometry. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Earman, John (2002a), “Gauge Matters”, Gauge Matters 69 (Proceedings): S209–S220.Google Scholar
Earman, John (2002b), “Thoroughly Modern McTaggart, or What McTaggart Would Have Said If He Had Learned the General Theory of Relativity”, Thoroughly Modern McTaggart, or What McTaggart Would Have Said If He Had Learned the General Theory of Relativity 2 (3): 1–28., http://www.philosophersimprint.org.Google Scholar
Kosso, Peter (2000), “The Empirical Status of Symmetries in Physics”, The Empirical Status of Symmetries in Physics 51:81–98.Google Scholar
Maudlin, Tim (2002), “Thoroughly Muddled McTaggart; or, How to Abuse Gauge Freedom to Generate Metaphysical Monstrosities”, Thoroughly Muddled McTaggart; or, How to Abuse Gauge Freedom to Generate Metaphysical Monstrosities 2 (4): 1–23., http://www.philosophersimprint.org.Google Scholar
Perrault, Claude (1673), Les dix livres d’architecture de Vitruve, corrigez et traduits nouvellement en françois, avec des notes et des figures. Paris: Jean Baptiste Coignard.Google Scholar
Tarasov, Lev (1986), This Amazingly Symmetrical World. Moscow: Mir.Google Scholar
Vitruvius ([1st century BC] 1999), Ten Books on Architecture. Translated by Rowland, Ingrid D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weinstein, Alan (1996), “Groupoids: Unifying Internal and External Symmetry”, Groupoids: Unifying Internal and External Symmetry 43:744–752.Google Scholar
Weyl, Hermann (1952), Symmetry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar