Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T17:02:59.112Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Notes on Carnap's Concept of Intensional Isomorphism and the Paradox of Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Leonard Linsky
Leonard Linsky*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , October 1949 , pp. 343 - 347
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association 1949

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 C. H. Langford, “The Notion of Analysis in Moore's Philosophy,” The Philosophy of G. E. Moore (Evanston and Chicago, 1942), 321–342.

2 M. Black, “The Paradox of Analysis,” Mind, LIII: 211 (1944), 263–267.

3 M. White, “A Note on the ‘Paradox of Analysis’,” Mind, LIV: 213 (1945), 71–72.

4 Langford, op, cit., p. 323.

5 Rudolf Carnap, Meaning and Necessity (Chicago, Ill., 1947).

6 The material on Carnap's concept of intensional isomorphism is drawn from Carnap's Meaning and Necessity, paragraph 14, Chap. I.

7 Ibid., p. 56.

8 Ibid., p. 8.

9 Ibid., p. 8.

10 Ibid., p. 56.

11 Ibid., p. 56.

12 Ibid., p. 58.

13 Ibid., pp. 63–64.

14 Ibid., p. 63.

15 Ibid., p. 57.

16 Ibid., p. 57.

17 Ibid., pp. 57–58.

18 Ibid., p. 58.

19 This argument was suggested to me in conversation with Dr. Benson Mates of the University of California, Berkeley.