Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T16:51:13.598Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Critical Remarks Concerning Prigogine's Conception of Temporal Irreversibility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Guido Verstraeten
Guido Verstraeten*
Affiliation:
Centrum voor Logika Katholieke Universiteit Leuven and Department of Physics Chancellor College University of Malawi
*
‡Send reprint requests to the author, Hoger Instituut voor Wijsbegeerte, Centrum voor Logika, K. U. Leuven, Kardinaal Mercierplein 2, B-3000 Leuven, BELGIUM.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The concept underlying Prigogine's ideas is the asymmetric “lifetime” he introduces into thermodynamics in addition to the symmetric time parameter. By identifying processes by means of causal chains of genidentical events, we examine the intrinsic order of lifetime adopting Grünbaum's symmetric time order. Further, we define the physical meaning and the actuality of the processes under consideration. We conclude that Prigogine's microscopic temporal irreversibility is tacitly assumed at macroscopic level. Moreover, his “new” complementarity lacks any scientific foundation. Finally, we put forward the fact-like origin of temporal irreversibility referring to classical thermodynamics.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 58 , Issue 4 , December 1991 , pp. 639 - 654
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

We wish to thank Professor H. Roelants for his constructive remarks. We also thank the Nationaal Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek for financial support.

References

Bridgman, P. W. (1961), The Nature of Thermodynamics. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Bunge, M. (1967), Springer Tracts in Natural Philosophy. Vol. 10, Foundations of Physics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Glansdorff, P. and Prigogine, I. (1964), “On a General Evolution Criterion in Macroscopic Physics”, Physica 30: 351–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grünbaum, A. (1973), Philosophical Problems of Space and Time. 2d, enlarged ed. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haken, H. (1983), Synergetics: An Introduction: Nonequilibrium Phase Transitions and Self-Organization of Physics, Chemistry, and Biology. 3rd revised and enlarged ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Hollinger, H. B. and Zenzen, M. J. (1985), The Nature of Irreversibility: A Study of Its Dynamics and Physical Origins. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misra, B. (1978), “Nonequilibrium Entropy, Lyapounov Variables, and Ergodic Properties of Classical Systems”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 75: 1627–1631.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Penrose, O. (1970), Foundations of Statistical Mechanics: A Deductive Treatment. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Popper, K. (1956a), Letter to the Editor “The Arrow of Time”, Nature 177: 538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, K. (1956b), Letter to the Editors in Response to “Irreversibility and Mechanics”, by R. Schlegel. Nature 178: 382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, K. (1957), Letter to the Editors in Response to “Irreversible Processes in Physical Theory”, by E. L. Hill and A. Grünbaum. Nature 179: 1297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, K. (1958), Letter to the Editors in Response to a Letter by R. C. L. Bosworth on “Irreversible Processes in Physical Theory”, by E. L. Hill and A. Grünbaum. Nature 181: 402–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prigogine, I. (1967), Introduction to Thermodynamics of Irreversible Processes. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Prigogine, I. (1980), From Being to Becoming: Time and Complexity in the Physical Sciences. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
Prigogine, I. and Stengers, I. (1984), Order Out of Chaos: Man's New Dialogue with Nature. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Reed, M. and Simon, B. (1975), Fourier Analysis, Self Adjointness, Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics 2. New York: Academic Press. Theorem 8, 8.X.39.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H. (1956), The Direction of Time. Edited by Reichenbach, M. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sklar, L. (1976), Space, Time and Spacetime. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truesdell, C. and Bharatha, S. (1977), The Concepts and Logic of Classical Thermodynamics as a Theory of Heat Engines: Rigorously Constructed upon the Foundation Laid by S. Carnot and F. Reech. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verstraeten, G. (1986), “Thermodynamical Reduction of the Anisotropy of Time by Introducing Irreversibility on Microscopical Scale”, in Y. S. Kim and W. W. Zachary (eds.), Lecture Notes in Physics. Vol. 278, The Physics of Phase Space: Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos, Geometric Quantization, and Wigner Function. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 438–440.Google Scholar
Verstraeten, G. (1987), “Towards a Microscopic Foundation of Entropy?” in Abstracts of the 8th International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science 2: Moscow: Institute of Philosophy of the Academy of Sciences of the U.S.S.R., pp. 173–175.Google Scholar