Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-gr6zb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-16T15:51:15.928Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Should we Explain the EPR Correlations Causally?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Andrew Elby
Andrew Elby*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of California at Berkeley
*
‡Send reprint requests to the author, Department of Physics, 366 LeConte Hall, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Using three intuitive notions about causes, including Redhead's robustness condition, I formulate necessary conditions on partial causes. I then demonstrate that we cannot explain the EPR correlations in terms of partial causes unless we abandon the quantum mechanical framework and adopt a nonlocal hidden-variable theory. The argument, unlike its predecessors, does not appeal to relativity theory.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 59 , Issue 1 , March 1992 , pp. 16 - 25
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

I would like to thank Professor Frank Arntzenius, Professor Michael Redhead and Dr. Jeremy Butterfield for helpful criticisms. This work, written in the Department of History and Philosophy of Science, Cambridge University, was supported by the Harvard Frank Knox Memorial Fellowship.

References

Bohm, D. and Hiley, B. (1984), “Measurement Understood Through the Quantum Potential Approach”, Foundations of Physics 14: 255–274.10.1007/BF00730211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarrett, J. (1984), “On the Physical Significance of the Locality Conditions in the Bell Arguments”, Noûs 18: 569–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redhead, M. (1983), “Nonlocality and Peaceful Coexistence”, in Swinburne, R. (ed.), Space, Time, and Causality. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 151–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redhead, M. (1987), Incompleteness, Nonlocality, and Realism: A Prolegomenon to the Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Redhead, M. (1989), “Nonfactorizability, Stochastic Causality, and Passion at a Distance”, in Cushing, J. and McMullin, E. (eds.), Philosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory: Reflections on Bell's Theorem. Evanston: Notre Dame University Press, pp. 145–153.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, H. (1956), The Direction of Time. Edited by Reichenbach, M. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmon, W. (1984), Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar