Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:42:19.778Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Self-Induced Decoherence and the Classical Limit of Quantum Mechanics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Mario Castagnino  and
Olimpia Lombardi
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper we argue that the emergence of the classical world from the underlying quantum reality involves two elements: self-induced decoherence and macroscopicity. Self-induced decoherence does not require the openness of the system and its interaction with the environment: a single closed system can decohere when its Hamiltonian has continuous spectrum. We show that, if the system is macroscopic enough, after self-induced decoherence it can be described as an ensemble of classical distributions weighted by their corresponding probabilities. We also argue that classicality is an emergent property that arises when the behavior of the system is described from an observational perspective.

Type
Quantum Mechanics
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 72 , Issue 5: Proceedings of the 2004 Biennial Meeting of The Philosophy of Science Association. Part I: Contributed Papers , December 2005 , pp. 764 - 776
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Antoniou, Ioannis, Suchanecki, Zdislaw, Laura, Roberto, and Tasaki, Syuichi (1997), “Intrinsic Irreversibility of Quantum Systems with Diagonal Singularity”, Intrinsic Irreversibility of Quantum Systems with Diagonal Singularity 241:737–772.Google Scholar
Belot, Gordon, and Earman, John (1997), “Chaos out of Order: Quantum Mechanics, the Correspondence Principle and Chaos”, Chaos out of Order: Quantum Mechanics, the Correspondence Principle and Chaos 28:147–182.Google Scholar
Bruer, John (1982), “The Classical Limit of Quantum Theory”, The Classical Limit of Quantum Theory 50:167–212.Google Scholar
Castagnino, Mario (2004), “The Classical-Statistical Limit of Quantum Mechanics”, The Classical-Statistical Limit of Quantum Mechanics 335:511–517.Google Scholar
Castagnino, Mario, and Gadella, Manuel (2007), “The Problem of the Classical Limit of Quantum Mechanics and the Role of Self-Induced Decoherence”, Foundations of Physics, forthcoming (Los Alamos National Laboratory, quant-ph/0306014).Google Scholar
Castagnino, Mario, and Laura, Roberto (2000a), “Functional Approach to Quantum Decoherence and the Classical Final Limit”, Functional Approach to Quantum Decoherence and the Classical Final Limit 62: 022107.Google Scholar
Castagnino, Mario, and Laura, Roberto (2000b), “Functional Approach to Quantum Decoherence and the Classical Limit: The Mott and Cosmological Problems”, Functional Approach to Quantum Decoherence and the Classical Limit: The Mott and Cosmological Problems 39:1737–1765.Google Scholar
Castagnino, Mario, and Lombardi, Olimpia (2003), “The Self-Induced Approach to Decoherence in Cosmology”, The Self-Induced Approach to Decoherence in Cosmology 42:1281–1299.Google Scholar
Castagnino, Mario, and Lombardi, Olimpia (2004), “Self-Induced Decoherence: A New Approach”, Self-Induced Decoherence: A New Approach 35:73–107.Google Scholar
Castagnino, Mario, and Ordoñez, Adolfo (2004), “Algebraic Formulation of Quantum Decoherence”, Algebraic Formulation of Quantum Decoherence 43:695–719.Google Scholar
d’Espagnat, Bernard (1995), Veiled Reality: An Analysis of Present-Day Quantum Mechanical Concepts. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Iguri, Sergio, and Castagnino, Mario (1999), “The Formulation of Quantum Mechanics in Terms of Nuclear Algebras”, The Formulation of Quantum Mechanics in Terms of Nuclear Algebras 38:143–164.Google Scholar
Kronz, Frederick (1998), “Nonseparability and Quantum Chaos”, Nonseparability and Quantum Chaos 65:50–75.Google Scholar
Laura, Roberto, and Castagnino, Mario (1998a), “Minimal Irreversible Quantum Mechanics: Mixed States and the Diagonal Singularity”, Minimal Irreversible Quantum Mechanics: Mixed States and the Diagonal Singularity 57:4140–4152.Google Scholar
Laura, Roberto, and Castagnino, Mario (1998b), “Functional Approach for Quantum Systems with Continuous Spectrum”, Functional Approach for Quantum Systems with Continuous Spectrum 57:3948–3961.Google Scholar
Mackey, Michael (1989), “The Dynamic Origin of Increasing Entropy”, The Dynamic Origin of Increasing Entropy 61:981–1015.Google Scholar
Paz, Juan Pablo, and Zurek, Wojciech (2002), “Environment-Induced Decoherence and the Transition from Quantum to Classical”, in Leggett, A. J. (ed.), Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 587. Heidelberg-Berlin: Springer (Los Alamos National Laboratory, quant-ph/0010011).Google Scholar
Rohrlich, Fritz (1989), “The Logic of Reduction: The Case of Gravitation”, The Logic of Reduction: The Case of Gravitation 19:1151–1170.Google Scholar
Treves, Francois (1967), Topological Vector Spaces, Distributions and Kernels. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
van Hove, Leon (1955), “Energy Corrections and Persistent Perturbation Effects in Continuous Spectra”, Energy Corrections and Persistent Perturbation Effects in Continuous Spectra 21:901–923.Google Scholar
Zurek, Wojciech (2003), “Decoherence, Einselection and the Quantum Origins of the Classical”, Decoherence, Einselection and the Quantum Origins of the Classical 75:715–776 (Los Alamos National Laboratory, quant-ph/0105127).Google Scholar