Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:39:42.953Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seeing the Forest and the Trees: Realism about Communities and Ecosystems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Jay Odenbaugh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this essay I first provide an analysis of various community concepts. Second, I evaluate two of the most serious challenges to the existence of communities—gradient and paleoecological analysis respectively—arguing that, properly understood, neither threatens the existence of communities construed interactively. Finally, I apply the same interactive approach to ecosystem ecology, arguing that ecosystems may exist robustly as well.

Type
Philosophy of Biology
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 74 , Issue 5: Proceedings of the 2006 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. Part I: Contributed Papers. Edited by Cristina Bicchieri and Jason Alexander , December 2007 , pp. 628 - 641
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

I would like to thank to the participants at the Ecology and Environmental Ethics Conference at the University of Utah, the Philosophy of Ecology Conference hosted by the University of Brisbane, and those participants in a session at the Philosophy of Science Association Meeting in Vancouver, British Columbia for helpful discussions of this essay. Specific thanks go to Mark Colyvan, Greg Cooper, Steve Downes, Chris Elliott, Marc Ereshefsky, Paul Griffiths, Jesse Hendrikse, Greg Mikkelson, Anya Plutynski, Kate Ritchie, Sahotra Sarkar, Kim Sterelny, and Rob Wilson.

References

Budiansky, S. (1995), Nature’s Keepers: The New Science of Nature Management. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Callaway, R. M. (1997), “Positive Interactions in Plant Communities and the Individualistic-Continuum Concept”, Positive Interactions in Plant Communities and the Individualistic-Continuum Concept 112:143–149.Google ScholarPubMed
Clements, Frederic (1916), Plant Succession: An Analysis of the Development of Vegetation. Publication no. 242. Washington, DC: Carnegie Institution of Washington.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colinvaux, P. (1979), Why Big Fierce Animals Are Rare: An Ecologist’s Perspective. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, M. B. (1981), “Quaternary History and the Stability of Forest Communities”, in West, D. G., Shugart, H. H., and Botkin, D. B. (eds.), Forest Succession: Concepts and Application. New York: Springer-Verlag, 132–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elder, C. (2004), Real Natures and Familiar Objects. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eliot, C. (2007), “Method and Metaphysics in Clements’s and Gleason’s Ecological Explanations”, Method and Metaphysics in Clements’s and Gleason’s Ecological Explanations 38:85–109.Google ScholarPubMed
Fitzsimmons, A. K. (1999a), Defending Illusions: Federal Protection of Ecosystems. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Fitzsimmons, A. K. (1999b), “The Illusion of Ecosystem Management”, The Illusion of Ecosystem Management 17:3–5.Google Scholar
Gleason, Henry (1917), “The Structure and Development of the Plant Association,” Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 44:463–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleason, Henry (1926), “The Individualistic Concept of the Plant Association”, The Individualistic Concept of the Plant Association 53:7–26.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. E. (1948), “Circular Causal Systems in Ecology”, Circular Causal Systems in Ecology 50:221–246.Google ScholarPubMed
Levins, Richard, and Lewontin, Richard (1993), “Dialectics and Reductionism in Ecology”, in The Dialectical Biologist. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 132–162.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. (2000), On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
MacArthur, Robert (1962), “Patterns of Terrestrial Bird Communities”, in Farner, D., King, J., and Parkes, K. (eds.), Avian Biology, Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press, 189–221.Google Scholar
Merricks, T. (2005), “Composition and Vagueness”, Composition and Vagueness 114:615–637.Google Scholar
Rickelfs, R. E. (2001), Ecology. New York: Harper-Collins.Google Scholar
Sider, T. (2001), Four-Dimensionalism: An Ontology of Persistence and Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sider, T. (2003), “Against Vague Existence”, Against Vague Existence 114:135–146.Google Scholar
Tansley, A. G. (1935), “The Use and Abuse of Vegetational Terms and Concepts”, The Use and Abuse of Vegetational Terms and Concepts 16:284–307.Google Scholar
van Inwagen, P. (1995), Material Beings. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittaker, R. (1975), Communities and Ecosystems. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar