Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T13:26:54.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Scientists’ Reuse of Old Empirical Data: Epistemological Aspects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

James W. McAllister
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article investigates epistemological aspects of scientists’ reuse of empirical data over decades and centuries. Giving examples, I discuss three respects in which empirical data are historical entities and the implications for the notion of data reuse. First, any data reuse necessitates metadata, which specify the data’s circumstances of origin. Second, interpretation of historical data often requires the tools of humanities disciplines, which produce a further historicization of data. Finally, some qualitative social scientists hold that data are personal to the researcher who coconstructs them in the research process and are therefore skeptical about the prospects of reusing data.

Type
Explanation
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 85 , Issue 5 , December 2018 , pp. 755 - 766
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

My thanks to Sabina Leonelli for organizing the symposium “Data in Time: The Epistemology of Historical Data,” 25th Biennial Meeting, Philosophy of Science Association, Atlanta, November 2016; the other speakers, Rachel Ankeny, David Sepkoski, and Alison Wylie; the audience for stimulating discussion; and Wendy Parker and two unnamed referees for comments on a previous draft.

References

Bellucci, Francesca, Woo, Judith, Kilburn, Christopher R. J., and Rolandi, Giuseppe. 2006. “Ground Deformation at Campi Flegrei, Italy: Implications for Hazard Assessment.” In Mechanisms of Activity and Unrest at Large Calderas, ed. Troise, Claudia, de Natale, Giuseppe, and Kilburn, Christopher R. J., 141–57. London: Geological Society.Google Scholar
Bishop, Libby, and Kuula-Luumi, Arja. 2017. “Revisiting Qualitative Data Reuse: A Decade On.” SAGE Open 7 (1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Charles Q. 2017. “Famous 600-Year-Old Nova Pinpointed in Modern Day.” https://www.space.com/37985-600-year-old-nova-pinpointed-modern-day.html.Google Scholar
Chuine, Isabelle, Yiou, Pascal, Viovy, Nicolas, Seguin, Bernard, Daux, Valérie, and Roy Ladurie, Emmanuel Le. 2004. “Historical Phenology: Grape Ripening as a Past Climate Indicator.” Nature 432:289–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cook, Alan. 1998. Edmond Halley: Charting the Heavens and the Seas. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Edwards, Paul N., Mayernik, Matthew S., Batcheller, Archer L., Bowker, Geoffrey C., and Borgman, Christine L.. 2011. “Science Friction: Data, Metadata, and Collaboration.” Social Studies of Science 41:667–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forero-Mendoza, Sabine. 2002. Le temps des ruines: Le goût des ruines et les formes de la conscience historique à la Renaissance. Seyssel: Champ Vallon.Google Scholar
Griffin, R. Elizabeth. 2006. “Detection and Measurement of Total Ozone from Stellar Spectra: Paper 2. Historic Data from 1935–1942.” Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 6:2231–40.Google Scholar
Griffin, R. Elizabeth 2017. “Rescue Old Data Before It’s Too Late.” Nature 545:267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffin, R. Elizabeth, and the CODATA Task Group Data at Risk. 2015. “When Are Old Data New Data?” GeoResJournal 6:92–97.Google Scholar
Grindlay, Jonathan E., Tang, Sumin, Simcoe, Robert, Laycock, Silas, Los, Edward, Mink, D. J., Doane, Alison, and Champine, George. 2009. “DASCH to Measure (and Preserve) the Harvard Plates: Opening the ~100-Year Time Domain Astronomy Window.” In Preserving Astronomy’s Photographic Legacy: Current State and the Future of North American Astronomical Plates, ed. Osborn, Wayne and Robbins, Lee, 101–10. San Francisco: Astronomical Society of the Pacific.Google Scholar
Guidoboni, Emanuela. 2010. “History and Volcanology: Dialogue Overdue? The Case of a False Eruption in Medieval Italy.” Eos 91:231–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guidoboni, Emanuela, and Ciuccarelli, Cecilia. 2011. “The Campi Flegrei Caldera: Historical Revision and New Data on Seismic Crises, Bradyseisms, the Monte Nuovo Eruption and Ensuing Earthquakes (Twelfth Century–1582 AD).” Bulletin of Volcanology 73:655–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammersley, Martyn. 1997. “Qualitative Data Archiving: Some Reflections on Its Prospects and Problems.” Sociology 31:131–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammersley, Martyn 2010. “Can We Re-use Qualitative Data via Secondary Analysis?” Sociological Research Online 15 (1): 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, Norwood R. 1958. Patterns of Discovery: An Inquiry into the Conceptual Foundations of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hayakawa, Hisashi, Tamazawa, Harufumi, Uchiyama, Yurina, Ebihara, Yusuke, Miyahara, Hiroko, Kosaka, Shunsuke, Iwahashi, Kiyomi, and Isobe, Hiroaki. 2017. “Historical Auroras in the 990s: Evidence for Great Magnetic Storms.” Solar Physics 292:12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heaton, Janet. 2004. Reworking Qualitative Data. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedenstierna-Jonson, Charlotte, Kjellström, Anna, Zachrisson, Torun, Krzewińska, Maja, Sobrado, Veronica, Price, Neil, Günther, Torsten, Jakobsson, Mattias, Götherström, Anders, and Storå, Jan. 2017. “A Female Viking Warrior Confirmed by Genomics.” American Journal of Physical Anthropology 164:853–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsia, Florence. 2017. “Astronomy after the Deluge.” In Science in the Archives: Pasts, Presents, Futures, ed. Daston, Lorraine, 17–52. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jesch, Judith. 2017. “Let’s Debate Female Viking Warriors Yet Again.” Norse and Viking Ramblings, September 9. http://norseandviking.blogspot.nl/2017/09/lets-debate-female-viking-warriors-yet.html.Google Scholar
Jones, Phil. 2008. “Historical Climatology—a State of the Art Review.” Weather 63:181–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kronk, Gary W. 1999. Cometography: A Catalog of Comets. Vol. 1, Ancient–1799. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Law, John. 2004. After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonelli, Sabina. 2018. “The Time of Data: Timescales of Data Use in the Life Sciences.” Philosophy of Science, in this issue.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Roy Ladurie, Emmanuel. 1959. “Histoire et climat.” Annales: Economies, Sociétés, Civilisations 14:3–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauthner, Natasha S., Parry, Odette, and Backett-Milburn, Kathryn. 1998. “The Data Are Out There, or Are They? Implications for Archiving and Revisiting Qualitative Data.” Sociology 32:733–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Niamh. 2007. “(Re)using Qualitative Data?” Sociological Research Online 12 (3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pyle, David M. 2017. Volcanoes: Encounters through the Ages. Oxford: Bodleian Library.Google Scholar
Rabinow, Paul, and Sullivan, William M., eds. 1987. Interpretive Social Science: A Second Look. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Robbirt, Karen M., Davy, Anthony J., Hutchings, Michael J., and Roberts, David L.. 2011. “Validation of Biological Collections as a Source of Phenological Data for Use in Climate Change Studies: A Case Study with the Orchid Ophrys sphegodes.” Journal of Ecology 99:235–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudwick, Martin J. S. 2008. Worlds before Adam: The Reconstruction of Geohistory in the Age of Reform. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schechner, Sara J., and Sliski, David. 2016. “The Scientific and Historical Value of Annotations on Astronomical Photographic Plates.” Journal for the History of Astronomy 47:3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shara, Michael M., et al. 2017. “Proper-Motion Age Dating of the Progeny of Nova Scorpii AD 1437.” Nature 548:558–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharma, Sapna, Magnuson, John J., Batt, Ryan D., Winslow, Luke A., Korhonen, Johanna, and Aono, Yasuyuki. 2016. “Direct Observations of Ice Seasonality Reveal Changes in Climate over the Past 320–570 Years.” Scientific Reports 6:25061.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slavnić, Zoran. 2013. “Towards Qualitative Data Preservation and Re-use—Policy Trends and Academic Controversies in UK and Sweden.” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 14 (2): 10.Google Scholar
Stanley, Matthew. 2013. “Where Is That Moon, Anyway? The Problem of Interpreting Historical Solar Eclipse Observations.” In “Raw Data” Is an Oxymoron, ed. Gitelman, Lisa, 77–88. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stephenson, F. Richard, and Green, David A.. 2002. Historical Supernovae and Their Remnants. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, F. Richard, and Green, David A. 2005. “A Reappraisal of Some Proposed Historical Supernovae.” Journal for the History of Astronomy 36:217–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrant, Anna. 2017. “Getting Out of the Swamp? Methodological Reflections on Using Qualitative Secondary Analysis to Develop Research Design.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 20:599–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Paul. 2000. “Re-using Qualitative Research Data: A Personal Account.” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 1 (3): 27.Google Scholar
Vanderbilt, Kristin, and Blankman, David. 2017. “Reliable Metadata and the Creation of Trustworthy, Reproducible, and Re-usable Data Sets.” In Stepping in the Same River Twice: Replication in Biological Research, ed. Shavit, Ayelet and Ellison, Aaron M., 179–94. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, David T., and Peebles, P. J. E.. 2000. “Discovery of the Cosmic Microwave Background.” Physica Scripta T85:136–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willis, Charles G., et al. 2017. “Old Plants, New Tricks: Phenological Research Using Herbarium Specimens.” Trends in Ecology and Evolution 32:531–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wylie, Alison. 2017. “How Archaeological Evidence Bites Back: Strategies for Putting Old Data to Work in New Ways.” Science, Technology, and Human Values 42:203–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar