Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T18:25:09.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Scientific Naming

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

William Kent
William Kent*
Affiliation:
University of Utah
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Theory and Practice; Precision and Vagueness. There has long been a conflict between the theory and the practice of scientific naming. The theory expressed both by working scientists and by philosophers has almost always been that precision is an essential part of the scientific attitude and of the procedures and results of science. Theoretically, metaphors have been scorned as belonging to poetry or to philosophy rather than to science. In scientific practice, however, vagueness and metaphor are constantly present; and they are particularly evident at the advancing frontiers of any science, whether mathematical, natural, or social.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , July 1958 , pp. 185 - 193
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Brandt, Joseph A.: “I Can't Quite Hear You, Doctor,” Harper's Magazine, 192: 247–51 (1946).Google Scholar
2. Cassirer, Ernst: “The Influence of Language upon the Development of Scientific Thought,” Journal of Philosophy, 39: 309–27 (1942).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Duveen, Denis I., and Klickstein, Herbert S.: “The Introduction of Lavoisier's Chemical Nomenclature into America,” Isis, 45: 278–92, 368–82 (1954).Google ScholarPubMed
4. Faraday, Michael: Experimental Researches in Electricity, vol. 1. London, 1839.Google Scholar
5. Faraday, Michael: Faraday's Diary, vol. 2, ed. Thomas Martin. London: Bell, 1932.Google Scholar
6. Feuer, Lewis S.: “Sociological Aspects of the Relation Between Language and Philosophy,” Philosophy of Science, 20: 85–100 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. French, Sidney J.: Torch and Crucible: the Life and Death of Antoine Lavoisier. Princeton, 1941.Google Scholar
8. Freud, Sigmund: The Origin and Development of Psychoanalysis. Chicago: Regnery, 1955.Google Scholar
9. Hoijer, Harry, ed.: Language in Culture. Chicago, 1954.Google Scholar
10. Jaeger, Edmund C.: A Source-book of Biological Names and Terms. Springfield: Thomas, 1947.Google Scholar
11. Johnson, Francis R.: “Latin versus English: the Sixteenth-Century Debate over Scientific Terminology,” Studies in Philology, 41: 109–35 (1944).Google Scholar
12. Lavoisier, Antoine: Traité Élémentaire de Chimie. [1st ed., Paris, 1789]. Paris: Gauthier-Villars, 1937.Google Scholar
13. Murray, James A. H., ed.: A New English Dictionary on Historical Principles. Oxford, 1888-1921.Google Scholar
14. Peters, R. S., ed.: Brett's History of Psychology. London, 1953.Google Scholar
15. Richeson, A. W.: “On Faraday's Terminology in Electrolysis,” Isis 36: 160–162 (1946). Commented on by Sidney M. Edelstein, Isis, 37: 180 (1947).Google ScholarPubMed
16. Savory, Theodore H.: The Language of Science. London: Deutsch, 1953.Google Scholar
17. Stephen, Leslie, and Lee, Sidney, eds.: Dictionary of National Biography, vol. 6. Oxford, 1949-50.Google Scholar
18. Stevens, Neil E.: “The Moral Obligation to be Intelligible,” Scientific Monthly, 70: 111–5 (1950).Google ScholarPubMed
19. Thompson, Silvanus P.: Michael Faraday: His Life and Work. London: Cassell, 1898.Google Scholar
20. Todhunter, I.: William Whewell, vol. 2. London: Macmillan, 1876.Google Scholar
21. Whewell, William: The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences, 2nd ed. London, 1847.Google Scholar
22. Whitmore, Charles E.: “The Language of Science,” Scientific Monthly 80: 185–91 (1955).Google Scholar