Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:38:10.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Science and the Problem of PSI

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Kenneth L. Shewmaker
Affiliation:
Oklahoma City V.A. Hospital and University of Oklahoma
Carlton W. Berenda
Affiliation:
Oklahoma City V.A. Hospital and University of Oklahoma

Abstract

Some issues raised by parapsychological phenomena (psi) are examined in the light of their implications for a philosophy of science. It is shown that the kinds of problems psi poses for science vary with the way one conceives of science as well as one's conception of psi. It is suggested that psi may be a product of the fact that all of our scientific concepts are abstractions and therefore oversimplifications. This raises the possibility that our best conceptual technique for dealing with psi is a non-discursive symbolism, since this would not demand “classes” (oversimplification). Implications of this approach are considered.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Aiken, H. D., The Age of Ideology. N. Y.: Mentor, 1956.Google Scholar
[2] Arieti, S., Interpretation of Schizophrenia. N. Y.: Brunner, 1955.Google Scholar
[3] Berenda, C. W., “Is clinical psychology a science?Amer. Psychologist, 12, 1957, 725729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Carrington, H., Mysterious Psychic Phenomena. Boston: Christopher Publ. House, 1954.Google Scholar
[5] Ciba Foundation Symposium on Extrasensory Perception. (Eds.: Wolstenholme, & Miller, ) Boston: Little, Brown, 1956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Einstein, A., Essays in Science. N. Y.: Philosophical Library, n.d.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Emerson, R. W., The Complete Works of Ralph Walso Emerson. N. Y.: Wise, 1921.Google Scholar
[8] Fodor, N., New Approaches to Dream Interpretation. N. Y.: Citadel Press, 1951.Google Scholar
[9] Frank, P., Philosophy of Science. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1957.Google Scholar
[10] Fromm, E., The Forgotten Language. N. Y.: Rinehart, 1951.Google Scholar
[11] Jung, C. G., & Pauli, W., The Interpretation of Nature and the Psyche. N. Y.: Pantheon, 1955.Google Scholar
[12] Kierkegaard, S., Fear and Trembling, and The Sickness unto Death. Garden City: Double-day Anchor, 1955.Google Scholar
[13] Lamar, E., Hobbs, Margaret, & Mull, Helen, “Friendship as a factor in ESP,” J. gen. Psychol., 55, 1956, 281283.Google Scholar
[14] Langer, Susanne K., Philosophy in a New Key. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard, 1951.Google Scholar
[15] Langer, Susanne K., Feeling and Form. N. Y.: Scribner, 1953.Google Scholar
[16] McConnell, R. A., “Psi phenomena and methodology,” Amer. Sci., 45, #2, 125.Google Scholar
[17] Proceedings of the First International Conference of Parapsychological Studies. N. Y.: Parapsychology Foundation, 1955.Google Scholar
[18] Rhine, J. B., The Reach of the Mind. London: Faber & Faber, n. d.Google Scholar
[19] Rhine, J. B., “Comments on Science and the Supernatural,Science, 123, # 3184, 1956, 1114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20] Rhine, J. B., & Pratt, J. G., Parapsychology: Frontier Science of the Mind. Springfield, Ill.: Thomas, 1957.Google Scholar
[21] Rogers, C., “Persons or Science,” Amer. Psychologist, 10, 1955, 275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22] Russell, B., Mysticism and Logic. Garden City: Doubleday Anchor, 1957.Google Scholar
[23] Soal, S. G., & Bateman, F., Modern Experiments in Telepathy. New Haven: Yale, 1954.Google Scholar
[24] Spiegelberg, H., “Supernaturalism or naturalism: a study in meaning and verifiability,” Phil. of Sci., 18, 1951, 339368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[25] Unamuno, M., The Tragic Sense of Life. (Tr.: Flitch) London: Macmillan, 1931.Google Scholar
[26] West, D. J., Psychical Research Today. London: Duckworth, 1954.Google Scholar