Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-2jptb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-16T16:30:31.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Routine of Discovery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Edward G. Ballard
Edward G. Ballard*
Affiliation:
Tulane University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In this paper I wish to contrast briefly one of the later developments in philosophy, the philosophy of the concrete, with an archaic mode of thought and then to show how certain defects in each were avoided in the development of the scientific method.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , April 1953 , pp. 157 - 163
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

(1) Ballard, E. G. “Subject of Aristotle's Poetics,” The Personalist, XXXII, 4, October, 1951.Google Scholar
(2) Bréhier, E. Les Thèmes Actuels de la Philosophie, Paris, 1951, p. 38.Google Scholar
(3) Buchanan, S. Editor's Introduction to The Portable Plato, New York: The Viking Press, 1948, pp. 1–33.Google Scholar
(4) Croce, B. History as the Story of Liberty, N. Y., 1941, p. 188.Google Scholar
(5) Eliade, M. Le Mythe de l'Éternal Retour, Paris, 1949, p. 42.Google Scholar
(6) Ibid., p. 137.Google Scholar
(7) Lalande, A. Vocabulaire technique et critique de la Philosophie, Paris, 1947, 46; p.e.y. from A. J. Jones' R. Euken, A Philosophy of Life.Google Scholar
(8) Murray, Sir G. “An Excursus on Ritual Forms Preserved in Greek Tragedy,” Themis' by J. Harrison, Cambridge, 1912, pp. 341–363.Google Scholar