Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:02:45.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Risk of Using Inductive Risk to Challenge the Value-Free Ideal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Inmaculada de Melo-Martín  and
Kristen Intemann
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The argument from inductive risk has been embraced by many as a successful account of the role of values in science that challenges the value-free ideal. We argue that it is not obvious that the argument from inductive risk actually undermines the value-free ideal. This is because the inductive risk argument endorses an assumption held by proponents of the value-free ideal: that contextual values never play an appropriate role in determining evidence. We show that challenging the value-free ideal ultimately requires rejecting this assumption.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 83 , Issue 4 , October 2016 , pp. 500 - 520
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

Thank you to Hugh Lacey and Gregor Betz for helpful comments to an earlier version of this article. We are grateful also to several reviewers who pressed us on some of the points made in the manuscript and forced us to be more precise in our claims. Whatever errors remain are, of course, our responsibility.

References

Agarwal, Anil. 2002. “A Southern Perspective on Curbing Global Climate Change.” In Climate Change Policy: A Survey, ed. Schneider, Stephen H., Rosencranz, Armin, and Niles, John O., 375–92. Washington, DC: Island.Google Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth. 2004. “Uses of Value Judgments in Science: A General Argument, with Lessons from a Case Study of Feminist Research on Divorce.” Hypatia 19 (1): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betz, Gregor. 2007. “Probabilities in Climate Policy Advice: A Critical Comment.” Climatic Change 85 (1–2): 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betz, Gregor 2013. “In Defense of the Value Free Ideal.” European Journal of the Philosophy of Science 3 (2): 207–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biddle, Justin. 2007. “Lessons from the Vioxx Debacle: What the Privatization of Science Can Teach Us about Social Epistemology.” Social Epistemology 21:21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biddle, Justin 2013. “State of the Field: Transient Underdetermination and Values in Science.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 44 (1): 124–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biddle, Justin, and Winsberg, Eric. 2010. “Value Judgements and the Estimation of Uncertainty in Climate Modeling.” In New Waves in Philosophy of Science, ed. Magnus, P. D. and Busch, Jacob, 172–97. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Brown, Matthew. 2014. “Values in Science beyond Underdetermination and Inductive Risk.” Philosophy of Science 80 (5): 829–39.Google Scholar
Callicott, J. Baird, Crowder, Larry B., and Mumford, Karen. 1999. “Current Normative Concepts in Conservation.” Conservation Biology 13 (1): 22–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Melo-Martin, Inmaculada, and Intemann, Kristen. 2007. “Can Ethical Reasoning Contribute to Better Epidemiology? A Case Study in Research on Racial Health Disparities.” European Journal of Epidemiology 22 (4): 215–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dorato, Mauro. 2004. “Epistemic and Nonepistemic Values in Science.” In Science, Values, and Objectivity, ed. Machamer, Peter K. and Wolters, Gereon, 52–77. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Heather. 2000. “Inductive Risk and Values in Science.” Philosophy of Science 67 (4): 559–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Heather 2003. “The Moral Responsibilities of Scientists: Tensions between Autonomy and Responsibility.” American Philosophical Quarterly 40 (1): 59–68.Google Scholar
Douglas, Heather 2009. Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupré, John. 2007. “Fact and Value.” In Value-Free Science? Ideals and Illusions, ed. Kincaid, Harold, Dupré, John, and Wylie, Alyson, 27–41. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, Kevin. 2009. “The Ethical Significance of Language in the Environmental Sciences: Case Studies from Pollution Research.” Ethics, Place, and Environment 12 (2): 157–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, Kevin 2011. Is a Little Pollution Good for You? Incorporating Societal Values in Environmental Research. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, Kevin 2013. “Douglas on Values: From Indirect Roles to Multiple Goals.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 44 (3): 375–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, Kevin, and McKaughan, Daniel J.. 2014. “Nonepistemic Values and the Multiple Goals of Science.” Philosophy of Science 81 (1): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, Kevin, and Willmes, David. 2013. “Cognitive Attitudes and Values in Science.” Philosophy of Science 80 (5): 807–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Steven. 1996. Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge. Medicine and Society 7. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Freese, William, and Schubert, David. 2004. “Safety Testing and Regulation of Genetically Engineered Foods.” Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Reviews 21:299–324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haack, Susan. 1998. Manifesto of a Passionate Moderate: Unfashionable Essays. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hempel, Carl G. 1965. Aspects of Scientific Explanation, and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Intemann, Kristen. 2015. “Distinguishing between Legitimate and Illegitimate Values in Climate Modeling.” European Journal of Philosophy of Science 5 (2): 217–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Intemann, Kristen, and de Melo-Martin, Inmaculada. 2010. “Social Values and Scientific Evidence: The Case of the HPV Vaccines.” Biology and Philosophy 25 (2): 203–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
John, Stephen. 2015. “The Example of the IPCC Does Not Vindicate the Value Free Ideal: A Reply to Gregor Betz.” European Journal of Philosophy 192 (1): 79–96.Google Scholar
Kirchhoff, Christine J., Lemos, Maria Carmen, and Dessai, Suraje. 2013. “Actionable Knowledge for Environmental Decision Making: Broadening the Usability of Climate Science.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 38:393–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip. 2001. Science, Truth, and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kloprogge, Penny, and Van Der Sluijs, Jeroen P.. 2006. “The Inclusion of Stakeholder Knowledge and Perspectives in Integrated Assessment of Climate Change.” Climatic Change 75 (3): 359–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krimsky, Sheldon. 2003. Science in the Private Interest: Has the Lure of Profits Corrupted Biomedical Research? Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Lacey, Hugh. 1999. Is Science Value Free? Values and Scientific Understanding. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lacey, Hugh 2005. Values in Science. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Lackey, Robert T. 2007. “Science, Scientists, and Policy Advocacy.” Conservation Biology 21 (1): 12–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laudan, Larry. 2004. “The Epistemic, the Cognitive, and the Social.” In Science, Values, and Objectivity, ed. Machamer, Peter K. and Wolters, Gereon, 14–23. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longino, Helen E. 1990. Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMullin, Ernan. 1983. “Values in Science.” In PSA 1982: The Proceedings of the 1982 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, ed. Asquith, Peter and Nickels, Thomas, 3–28. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.Google Scholar
Michaels, David. 2008. Doubt Is Their Product: How Industry’s Assault on Science Threatens Your Health. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Boaz. 2014. “Science, Values, and Pragmatic Encroachment on Knowledge.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 4 (2): 253–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Sandra. 2004. “The Prescribed and Proscribed Values in Science Policy.” In Science, Values, and Objectivity, ed. Machamer, Peter K. and Wolters, Gereon, 245–55. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Odenbaugh, Jay, 2003. “Values, Advocacy and Conservation Biology.” Environmental Values 12 (1): 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oreskes, Naomi, and Conway, Erik M.. 2010. Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Parker, Wendy S. 2010. “Whose Probabilities? Predicting Climate Change with Ensembles of Models.” Philosophy of Science 77 (5): 985–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pielke, Roger A. 2007. The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudner, Richard. 1953. “The Scientist qua Scientist Makes Value Judgments.” Philosophy of Science 20 (1): 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrader-Frechette, Kristin. 1991. Risk and Rationality: Philosophical Foundations for Populist Reforms. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrader-Frechette, Kristin 2007. Taking Action, Saving Lives: Our Duties to Protect Environmental and Public Health. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steel, Daniel. 2010. “Epistemic Values and the Argument from Inductive Risk.” Philosophy of Science 77 (1): 14–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steel, Daniel, and Whyte, Kyle Powys. 2012. “Environmental Justice, Values, and Scientific Expertise.” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 22 (2): 163–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tang, Samuel, and Dessai, Suraje. 2012. “Usable Science? The U.K. Climate Projections 2009 and Decision Support for Adaptation Planning.” Weather, Climate, and Society 4:300–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wickson, Fern, and Wynne, Brian. 2012. “Environmental Governance of Biotechnology: MON819 Maize in Europe.” Ethics, Policy and Environment 15 (3): 321–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winsberg, Eric. 2012. “Values and Uncertainties in the Predictions of Global Climate Models.” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 22 (2): 111–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed