Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:04:55.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rejoinder on the Principle of Simplicity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Lewis S. Feuer*
Affiliation:
University of California

Extract

There are three points which Professor Schlesinger makes in his criticism of my discussion of the principle of simplicity.

  1. (1) He holds that the principles of simplicity and verifiability may in actual use contradict each other. The simpler hypothesis will be rejected, he maintains, if it leads to unverified consequences.

  2. (2) He holds that it is legitimate to add auxiliary hypotheses to one's theory, if it is desired to allow, let us say, for the creation of the universe by a deity, or to exclude the possibility for all time of such events as a pail of water freezing on fire.

  3. (3) He maintains with Bridgman that the cosmogonists' use of the simple notion that the same laws of nature hold throughout space-time leads to “perfectly hair-raising extrapolations” which a verificationist will reject.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1959 by Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)