Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:33:41.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reference Models: Using Models to Turn Data into Evidence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Teru Miyake
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Reference models of the earth’s interior play an important role in the acquisition of knowledge about the earth’s interior and the earth as a whole. Such models are used as a sort of standard reference against which data are compared. I argue that the use of reference models merits more attention than it has gotten so far in the literature on models, for it is an example of a method of doing science that has a long and significant history, and a study of reference models could increase our understanding of this methodology.

Type
Models and Measurement
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 82 , Issue 5 , December 2015 , pp. 822 - 832
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

Much of the research for this article was done under Startup Grant No. 4080821 at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore. I would like to thank Lina Jansson for helpful discussion. Some of the ideas in this article date back to research done at Stanford University, where I received the advice and encouragement of George Smith, Michael Friedman, Tom Ryckman, and Helen Longino. Finally, I would like to give special thanks to Pat Suppes, whose contributions are immeasurable.

References

Backus, George, and Gilbert, Freeman. 1967. “Numerical Applications of a Formalism for Geophysical Inverse Problems.” Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society 13:247–76.Google Scholar
Backus, George, and Gilbert, Freeman 1968. “The Resolving Power of Gross Earth Data.” Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society 16:169–205.10.1111/j.1365-246X.1968.tb00216.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backus, George, and Gilbert, Freeman 1970. “Uniqueness in the Inversion of Inaccurate Gross Earth Data.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A 266 (1173): 123–92.Google Scholar
Bullen, Keith. 1974. “Introductory Remarks on Standard Earth Model.” Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 9:1–3.10.1016/0031-9201(74)90072-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullen, Keith 1975. The Earth’s Density. London: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dziewonski, Adam, and Anderson, Don. 1981. “Preliminary Reference Earth Model.” Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 25:297–356.10.1016/0031-9201(81)90046-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dziewonski, Adam, Hales, Anton, and Lapwood, E. R.. 1975. “Parametrically Simple Earth Models Consistent with Geophysical Data.” Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 10:12–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, William. 2011. Isaac Newton’s Scientific Method: Turning Data into Evidence about Gravity and Cosmology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199570409.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMullin, Ernan. 1985. “Galilean Idealization.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 16 (3): 247–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morelli, Andrea, and Dziewonski, Adam. 1993. “Body Wave Traveltimes and a Spherically Symmetric P- and S-Wave Velocity Model.” Geophysical Journal International 112:178–94.10.1111/j.1365-246X.1993.tb01448.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Mary, and Morrison, Margaret. 1999. Models as Mediators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511660108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, Isaac. 1999. Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. Trans. Cohen, I. B. and Whitman, Anne. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Press, Frank. 1968. “Density Distribution in Earth.” Science 160 (3833): 1218–21.10.1126/science.160.3833.1218CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ritzwoller, Michael, and Lavely, Eugene. 1995. “Three-Dimensional Seismic Models of the Earth’s Mantle.” Reviews of Geophysics 33 (1): 1–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, George E. 2002. “The Methodology of the Principia.” In The Cambridge Companion to Newton, ed. Cohen, I. Bernard and Smith, George E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, George E. 2007. “Gaining Access: Using Seismology to Probe the Earth’s Insides.” http://www.stanford.edu/dept/cisst/events0506.html.Google Scholar
Smith, George E. 2014. “Closing the Loop: Testing Newtonian Gravity, Then and Now.” In Newton and Empiricism, ed. Biener, Zvi and Schliesser, Eric. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weisberg, Michael. 2013. Simulation and Similarity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimsatt, William. 2007. Re-engineering Philosophy for Limited Beings: Piecewise Approximations to Reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.2307/j.ctv1pncnrhCrossRefGoogle Scholar