Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-w7rtg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-13T22:00:41.174Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Recently Claimed Observation of Atomic Orbitals and Some Related Philosophical Issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Eric R. Scerri
Eric R. Scerri*
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
*
†Send requests for reprints to the author, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, 405 Hilgard Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90095–1569; email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The main thrust of the paper involves a theoretical and philosophical analysis of the claim made in September 1999 that atomic orbitals have been directly imaged for the first time. After a brief account of the recent claims the paper reviews the development of the orbit and later orbital concepts and analyzes the theoretical status of atomic orbitals. The conclusion is that contrary to these claims, atomic orbitals have not in fact been observed. The non-referring nature of modern atomic orbitals is discussed in the context of Laudan's writings on realism, the success of theories, and whether or not scientific terms refer. I conclude that the failure to observe orbitals is a good prima facie case for divorcing the success of theories from the question of whether their central terms refer. The added relevance of this case is that it concerns a current and highly successful theory. Finally, the relevance of this ‘floating model’ to contemporary discussions on scientific models is briefly considered.

Type
Metaphysics and Methodology of Science
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 68 , Issue S3: No. 3 Supplement: Proceedings of the 2000 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. Part I: Contributed Papers Sep., 2001 , 2001 , pp. S76 - S88
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Condon, E. U. and Shortley, G. H. (1935), The Theory of Atomic Spectra. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coppens, P. (1997), X-ray Charge Densities and Chemical Bonding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195098235.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, C. and Rosenberg, A. (1982), “In Defense of Convergent Realism”, Philosophy of Science 49:604–615. http://www.sciam.com/explorations/1999/092099cuprite/index.htn, “Observing Orbitals”.10.1086/289080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, C. J. (1999), “Electrons Seen in Orbit”, Nature 401:21–22.10.1038/43323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, M. (1999), “Picture Perfect Orbitals”, Chemical & Engineering News 77: 8.Google Scholar
Laudan, L. (1981), “A Confutation of Convergent Realism”, Philosophy of Science 48:1–49.10.1086/288975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Post, H. R. (1974), “Inaugural Lecture” (presented at Chelsea College, University of London). London: University of London Press.Google Scholar
Scerri, E. R. (1991), “Electronic Configurations, Quantum Mechanics and Reduction”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42:309–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scerri, E. R. (1997), “The Periodic Table and the Electron”, American Scientist 85:546–553.Google Scholar
Scerri, E. R. (2000), “The Failure of Reduction and How to Resist the Disunity of the Sciences in the Context of Chemical Education”, Science & Education 9:405–425.10.1023/A:1008719726538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsirelson, V. G. and Ozerov, R. P. (1996), Electron Density and Bonding in Crystals. Bristol and Philadelphia: Institute of Physics Publications.Google Scholar
Zuo, J. M., Kim, M., O'Keeffe, M., and Spence, J. C. H. (1999), “Direct Observation of d-orbital holes and Cu-Cu bonding in Cu2O”, Nature 401:49–52.10.1038/43403CrossRefGoogle Scholar