Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-06T03:42:09.765Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Qualitative Theory and Chemical Explanation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Michael Weisberg
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Roald Hoffmann and other theorists claim that we ought to use highly idealized chemical models (“qualitative models”) in order to increase our understanding of chemical phenomena, even though other models are available which make more highly accurate predictions. I assess this norm by examining one of the tradeoffs faced by model builders and model users—the tradeoff between precision and generality. After arguing that this tradeoff obtains in many cases, I discuss how the existence of this tradeoff can help us defend Hoffmann's norm for modelling.

Type
Causation and Explanation in Chemistry
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 71 , Issue 5: Proceedings of the 2002 Biennial Meeting of The Philosophy of Science Association. Part II: Symposia Papers , December 2004 , pp. 1071 - 1081
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

Many thanks to Michael Friedman, Peter Godfrey-Smith, Robin Hendry, Ben Kerr, Deena Skolnick, and Michael Strevens for extremely helpful comments on earlier drafts of this and related papers. John Brauman, Marc Feldman, Paul Needham, Joan Roughgarden, Janet Stemwedel, and Ward Watt also provided helpful comments in conversations about these themes. Most of all I would like to thank Roald Hoffmann who has been an inspiring mentor and whose reflections on the philosophical aspects of chemistry stimulated my interest in this topic. This research was partially supported by a National Science Foundation Pre-Doctoral Fellowship.

References

Carey, Francis A., and Sundberg, Richard J. (2000), Advanced Organic Chemistry A, 4th ed. New York: Kluwer Academic, Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
Carroll, Felix A. (1998), Perspectives on Structure and Mechanism in Organic Chemistry. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy (1983), How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Michael (1974), “Explanation and Scientific Understanding”, Explanation and Scientific Understanding 71:5–19.Google Scholar
Giere, Ronald N. (1988), Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, Carl G. (1965), “Aspects of Scientific Explanation”, in Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays. New York: Free Press, 331–496.Google Scholar
Hendry, Robin (2004), “The Physicists, the Chemists, and the Pragmatics of Explanation”, The Physicists, the Chemists, and the Pragmatics of Explanation 71:1048–1059.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Roald (1995), The Same and Not the Same. New York: Columbia University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Hoffmann, Roald (1998), “Qualitative Thinking in the Age of Modern Computational Chemistry: Or What Lionel Salem Knows”, Qualitative Thinking in the Age of Modern Computational Chemistry: Or What Lionel Salem Knows 424:1–6.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (1981), “Explanatory Unification”, Explanatory Unification 48:507–331.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Elisabeth A. (1994), The Structure and Confirmation of Evolutionary Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lowry, Thomas H., and Richardson, Kathleen S. (1987), Mechanism and Theory in Organic Chemistry, 3rd ed. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Orzak, Stephen Hecht, and Sober, Elliott (1993), “A Critical Assessment of Levin’s `The Strategy of Model Building in Population Biology' (1966)”, A Critical Assessment of Levin’s `The Strategy of Model Building in Population Biology' (1966) 68 (4): 533–546..Google Scholar
Strevens, Michael (2004), “The Causal and Unification Accounts of Explanation Unified—Causally”, The Causal and Unification Accounts of Explanation Unified—Causally 38:154–179.Google Scholar
Weisberg, Michael (2003), When Less Is More: Tradeoffs and Idealization in Model Building. Ph.D. dissertation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.Google Scholar
Woodward, Robert B., and Hoffmann, Roald (1970), The Conservation of Orbital Symmetry. Weinheim/Bergst.: Verlag Chemie.Google Scholar