Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T19:07:04.538Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Postulates of Behaviorism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

William Stephenson
William Stephenson*
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

We propose to take issue with a neo-behaviorist (19) upon what might seem to be a minor detail, and about which we are sure that, upon reflection, he would not differ from us. It has to do with the use of the word experience in a basic postulate of behaviorism. Even if by a hair's breadth this implies something categorically different from behavior, then, it seems to us, the essential meaning of behaviorism has been missed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , April 1953 , pp. 110 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

(1) Adrian, E. The Physical Background of Perception. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1947.Google Scholar
(2) Bentley, A. F. Behavior, Knowledge, Fact. Bloomington: Principia Press, 1935.Google Scholar
(3) Boring, E. G. The Physical Dimensions of Consciousness. New York: The Century Co., 1933.Google Scholar
(4) Brunswik, E. Systematic and representative design of psychological experiments. In J. Neyman (Ed.), Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press, 1949.Google Scholar
(5) Cantril, H., et al. III. The transactional view in psychological research. Science, 1949, 517–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6) Farrell, B. A. What is ‘experience‘? Mind, 1950, 49, 234, 170–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7) Freud, S. I: Fragment of an analysis of a case of hysteria. In Collected Papers (J. Riviere, translator). London: Hogarth Press, 1949, Vol. II, 13–134.Google Scholar
(8) Hunter, W. S. Human Behavior. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1928.Google Scholar
(9) Kantor, J. R. A Survey of the Science of Psychology. Bloomington: Principia Press. 1933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(10) Kantor, J. R. Psychology and Logic, Vol. I. Bloomington: Principia Press, 1944, 1951.Google Scholar
(11) Kantor, J. R. Psychology and Logic, Vol. II. Bloomington: Principia Press, 1944, 1951.Google Scholar
(12) Krech, D., and Crutchfield, R. Theory and Problems of Social Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(13) Lewin, K. A Dynamic Theory of Personality. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1935.Google Scholar
(14) Mace, C. A. Some implications of analytical behaviorism. Arist. Soc. Proc., 1948–1949.Google Scholar
(15) Rogers, C. Client-centered Therapy. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1951.Google Scholar
(16) Ryle, G. The Concept of Mind. London: Hutchinson, 1950.Google Scholar
(17) Skinner, B. F. The Behavior of Organisms. New York: Appleton-Century, 1938.Google Scholar
(18) Snygg, D., and Coombs, A. W. Individual Behavior. New York: Harpers, 1949.Google Scholar
(19) Spence, K. W. The postulates and methods of behaviorism. Psychol. Rev., 1948, 55, 67–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(20) Stephenson, W. Some observations on Q-methodology. Psych. Bull. 1952, 49, 489–498.Google Scholar
(21) Stephenson, W. Foundations of psychometry: four factor systems. Psychometrika, 1936, I, 195–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(22) Stevens, S. S. (Ed.). Handbook of Experimental Psychology. New York: Wiley & Sons, 1951.Google Scholar
(23) Ward, J. Psychological Principles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1933.Google Scholar
(24) Zilsel, E. Logical Empirical Analysis. Inter. Encycl. of Unified Sciences, Vol. II, No. 8. Chicago: University Chicago Press, 1941.Google Scholar