Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:24:56.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pluralism and Species Concepts, or When Must we Agree with One Another?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Kent E. Holsinger
Kent E. Holsinger*
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, The University of Connecticut
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 54 , Issue 3 , September 1987 , pp. 480 - 485
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

I am indebted to John Beatty and John Dupré for enlightening discussions on this topic. Philip Kitcher and Elliott Sober were kind enough to comment on an earlier draft of this paper. The research was supported in part by NIH grants GM28016 and GM10452.

References

Holsinger, K. E. (1984), “The Nature of Biological Species”, Philosophy of Science 51: 293–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, P. (1984a), “Species”, Philosophy of Science 51: 308–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, P. (1984b), “Against the Monism of the Moment: A Reply to Elliott Sober”, Philosophy of Science 51: 616–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishler, B. D. and Donoghue, M. J. (1982), “Species Concepts: A Case for Pluralism”, Systematic Zoology 31: 491–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ownbey, M. (1950), “Natural Hybridization and Amphiploidy in the Genus Tragopogon”, Tragopogon 37: 487–499.Google Scholar
Ownbey, M. and McCollum, G. (1953), “Cytoplasmic Inheritance and Reciprocal Amphiploidy in Tragopogon”, Tragopogon 40: 788–796.Google Scholar
Ownbey, M. and McCollum, G. (1954), “The Chromosomes of Tragopogon”, Tragopogon 56: 7–21.Google Scholar
Parker, E. D. (1979), “Phenotypic Consequences of Parthenogenesis in Cnemidophorus Lizards. I. Variability in Parthenogenetic and Sexual Populations”, Evolution 33: 1150–1166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parker, E. D. and Selander, R. (1976), “The Organization of Genetic Diversity in the Parthenogenetic Lizard Cnemidophorus tesselatus”, Cnemidophorus tesselatus 84: 791–805.Google ScholarPubMed
Roose, M. L. and Gottlieb, L. D. (1976), “Genetic and Biochemical Consequences of Polyploidy in Tragopogon”, Tragopogon 30: 818–830.Google ScholarPubMed
Sober, E. (1984), “Discussion: Sets, Species, and Evolution: Comments on Philip Kitcher's ‘Species‘”, Philosophy of Science 51: 334–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar