Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T23:37:52.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Philosophy's Neglect of the Social Sciences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Rollo Handy
Rollo Handy*
Affiliation:
University of South Dakota
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The problem of the “proper” relation of philosophy and science has been the source of many disputes in our intellectual history. Recently some philosophers and scientists have insisted that technical philosophy is neglecting the results of the social sciences to the detriment of philosophy. The purpose of this paper is to consider the attempts made by contemporary philosophers to utilize material from the behavioral sciences (for a few recent examples, see 2, 15, 19, 20, 23, 24, 29, 38, 41, 50), to review certain of the arguments in favor of the utilization of such material, and to consider the criticisms of that approach.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , April 1958 , pp. 117 - 124
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., and Sanford, R. N.: The Authoritarian Personality, New York, Harper and Bros., 1950, p. 971.Google Scholar
2. Albert, E. M.: “Value Sentences and Empirical Research,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. XVII, 1957.Google Scholar
3. Beck, W. S.: Modern Science and the Nature of Life, New York, Harcourt, Brace, 1957, p. 285.Google Scholar
4. Bidney, D.: “The Concept of Value in Modern Anthropology,” in Kroeber, A. L., et al., Anthropology Today, Chicago, University of Chicago, 1953.Google Scholar
5. Black, M.: “A Note on ‘Philosophy of Education,’” Harvard Educational Review, Vol. 26, 1956, p. 154.Google Scholar
6. Brandt, R. B.: Hopi Ethics: A Theoretical Analysis, Chicago, University of Chicago, 1951.Google Scholar
7. Broad, C. D.: Examination of McTaggarl's Philosophy, Vol. 1, Cambridge University, 1933, p. 270.Google Scholar
8. Carroll, J. B., Ed.: Language, Thought and Reality, New York, John Wiley and Sons, 1956.Google Scholar
9. Churchman, C. W.: “A Materialist Theory of Measurement,” in Sellars, R. W., McGill, V. J., and Farber, M., eds., Philosophy for the Future, New York, Macmillan, 1949, pp. 478–9.Google Scholar
10. Cohen, J. W.: “Technology and Philosophy,” The Colorado Quarterly, Vol. III, 1955, p. 413.Google Scholar
11. Cohen, J. W., “The Rôle of Philosophy in Culture,” Philosophy East and West, Vol. V, 1955.Google Scholar
12. d'Abro, A.: The Evolution of Scientific Thought from Newton to Einstein, 2nd. ed., New York, Dover, 1950, pp. 346–8.Google Scholar
13. Edel, A.: “Context and Content in the Theory of Ideas,” in Sellars, R. W., McGill, V. J., and Farber, M., eds., Philosophy for the Future, New York, Macmillan, 1949.Google Scholar
14. Edel, A.: “Coordinates of Criticism in Ethical Theory,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. VII, 1947.Google Scholar
15. Edel, A.: Ethical Judgment, Glencoe, The Free Press, 1955.Google Scholar
16. Edel, A.: “Some Relations of Philosophy and Anthropology,” American Anthropologist, Vol. 55, 1953, p. 660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Edel, A.: “Some Trends in American Naturalistic Ethics,” in Farber, M., ed., Philosophic Thought in France and The United Stales, Buffalo, University of Buffalo, 1950.Google Scholar
18. Farrell, B. A.: “An Appraisal of Therapeutic Positivism (II),” Mind, Vol. LV, 1946, p. 146.Google Scholar
19. Feuer, L. S.: “Political Myths and Metaphysics,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. XV, 1955.Google Scholar
20. Feuer, L. S.: Psychoanalysis and Ethics, Springfield, Charles C Thomas, 1955.Google Scholar
21. Fisch, M. H.: “The Critic of Institutions,” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, Vol. XXIX, 1956, p. 51.Google Scholar
22. Frenkel-Brunswik, E.: “Social Research and the Problem of Values: a Reply,” The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, Vol. 49, 1954, p. 470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. Golightly, C. L.: “Value as a Scientific Concept,” The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. LIII, 1956.Google Scholar
24. Handy, R.: “Personality Factors and Intellectual Production,” Philosophy of Science, Vol. 23, 1956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Hartung, F. E.: “Cultural Relativity and Moral Judgments,” Philosophy of Science, Vol. 21, 1954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Herrick, C. J.: The Evolution of Human Nature, Austin, University of Texas, 1956.Google Scholar
27. Hoijer, H., ed.: Language in Culture, Chicago, University of Chicago, 1954.Google Scholar
28. Hoijer, H.: “The Relation of Language to Culture,” in Kroeber, A. L., et al., Anthropology Today, Chicago, University of Chicago, 1953.Google Scholar
29. Hospers, J.: “Free-Will and Psychoanalysis,” in Sellars, W. and Hospers, J., eds., Readings in Ethical Theory, New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1952.Google Scholar
30. Hull, C. L.: A Behavior System, New Haven, Yale University, 1952.Google Scholar
31. Kattsoff, L. O.: Review of Lazerowitz's The Structure of Metaphysics, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. XVII, 1957.Google Scholar
32. Keynes, J. M.: Two Memoirs, New York, Kelley, 1949.Google Scholar
33. Kluckhohn, C.: “Ethical Relativity: Sic et Non,” The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. LII, 1955, p. 668.Google Scholar
34. Kluckhohn, C.: Mirror for Man, New York, McGraw-Hill, 1949, p. 285.Google Scholar
35. Kluckhohn, C.: “Values and Value-Orientations in the Theory of Action,” in Parsons, T., and Shils, E. A., eds., Toward a General Theory of Action, Cambridge, Harvard University, 1951, pp. 390–39.Google Scholar
36. Kurtz, P.: “Rule-Making,” The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. LIV, 1957, p. 213.Google Scholar
37. Lasswell, H. D.: “The Normative Impact of the Behavioral Sciences” Ethics, Vol. LXVII, 1957, p. 38.Google Scholar
38. Lazerowitz, M.: The Structure of Metaphysics, New York, Humanities Press, 1955.Google Scholar
39. Lefebvre, H.: “Knowledge and Social Criticism,” in Farber, M., ed., Philosophic Thought in France and The United Stales, Buffalo, University of Buffalo, 1950.Google Scholar
40. Masserman, J. H.: “Faith and Delusion in Psychotherapy,” The American Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 110, 1953.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41. Morris, C.: “Significance, Signification, and Painting,” in Lepley, R., ed., The Language of Value, New York, Columbia University, 1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42. Northrop, F. S. C.: “Ethical Relativism in the Light of Recent Legal Science,” The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. LII, 1955, pp. 654–65.Google Scholar
43. Piaget, J.: The Moral Judgment of the Child, Glencoe, Free Press, 1948, pp. 17–19.Google Scholar
44. Russell, B.: A History of Western Philosophy, New York, Simon and Schuster, 1945, pp. 826–27.Google Scholar
45. Schmidt, P. F.: “Some Criticisms of Cultural Relativism,” The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. LII, 1955.Google Scholar
46. Smith, H. W.: “Foreword,” in Beck, W. S., Modern Science and the Nature of Life, New York, Harcourt, Brace, 1957.Google Scholar
47. Strauss, L.: “Social Science and Humanism,” in White, L. D., ed., The State of the Social Sciences, Chicago, University of Chicago, 1956, p. 418.Google Scholar
48. Thorndike, E. L.: “Science and Values,” Science, Vol. 83, 1936.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
49. White, L. A.: “Ethnological Theory,” in Sellars, R. W., McGill, V. J., and Farber, M., eds., Philosophy for the Future, New York, Macmillan, 1949, pp. 378–79.Google Scholar
50. Wisdom, J. O.: The Unconscious Origin of Berkeley's Philosophy, London, Hogarth Press, 1953.Google Scholar