Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:19:41.135Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Philosophy of Science for the Twenty-First Century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Janet A. Kourany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two major reasons feminists are concerned with science relate to science's social effects: that science can be a powerful ally in the struggle for equality for women; and that all too frequently science has been a generator and perpetuator of inequality. This concern with the social effects of science leads feminists to a different mode of appraising science from the purely epistemic one prized by most contemporary philosophers of science. The upshot, I suggest, is a new program for philosophy of science, a program for a socially responsible philosophy of science.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 70 , Issue 1 , January 2003 , pp. 1 - 14
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

I would like to thank Marilyn Friedman, Don Howard, Philip Quinn, Alison Wylie, and an exceedingly conscientious and generous anonymous referee for very helpful comments and suggestions regarding my contributions to this dialogue, and also Ron Giere for his interest and willingness to participate. An earlier version of this first paper was presented at the 2001 Pacific Division American Philosophical Association symposium “What Does Feminism Contribute to the Philosophy of Science?”.

References

Benhabib, Seyla (1992), Situating the Self. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cartwright Nancy, Jordi Cat, Fleck, Lola, and Uebel, Thomas E. (1996), Otto Neurath: Philosophy between Science and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conkey, Margaret W., and Williams, Sarah H. (1991), “Original Narratives: The Political Economy of Gender in Archaeology”, in Leonardo, Micaela di (ed.), Gender at the Crossroads of Knowledge: Feminist Anthropology in the Postmodern Era. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 102–139.Google Scholar
Dickersin, Kay, and Schnaper, Lauren (1996), “Reinventing Medical Research”, in Moss, Kary L. (ed.), Man-Made Medicine: Women’s Health, Public Policy, and Reform. Durham: Duke University Press, 57–76.Google Scholar
Fausto-Sterling, Anne (1992), Myths of Gender, 2nd ed. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fausto-Sterling, Anne (2000), Sexing the Body: Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Ferber, Marianne A., and Nelson, Julie A. (eds.) (1993), Beyond Economic Man: Feminist Theory and Economics. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giere, Ronald N. (1999), Science without Laws. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heschel, Abraham J. (1965), Who is Man? Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Howard, Don (forthcoming), “Two Left Turns Make a Right: On the Curious Political Career of North-American Philosophy of Science at Mid-Century”, in Richardson, Alan and Hardcastle, Gary (eds.), Logical Empiricism in North America. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (1993), The Advancement of Science. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (2001), Science, Truth, and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kourany, Janet A. (ed.) (2002), The Gender of Science. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Longino, Helen (1994), “In Search of Feminist Epistemology”, In Search of Feminist Epistemology 77:472–485.Google Scholar
Longino, Helen (1995), “Gender, Politics, and the Theoretical Virtues”, Gender, Politics, and the Theoretical Virtues 104:383–397.Google Scholar
Longino, Helen (1997), “Cognitive and Non-Cognitive Values in Science: Rethinking the Dichotomy”, in Nelson, Lynn Hankinson and Nelson, Jack (eds.), Feminism, Science, and the Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 39–58.Google Scholar
Marecek, Jeanne (1995), “Psychology and Feminism: Can This Relationship Be Saved?”, in Stanton, Domna C. and Stewart, Abigail J. (eds.), Feminisms in the Academy. Ann Arbor, MI.: University of Michigan Press, 101–132.Google Scholar
Marshall, Eliot (1993), “The Politics of Breast Cancer”, The Politics of Breast Cancer 259:616–617.Google ScholarPubMed
McCumber, John (2001), Time in the Ditch: American Philosophy and the McCarthy Era. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Mirowski, Philip, and Sent, Esther-Mirjam (eds.) (2002), Science Bought and Sold: Essays in the Economics of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, Julie A. (1996), Feminism, Objectivity and Economics. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. (1999), Sex and Social Justice. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller (1987), Justice, Gender, and the Family. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller (1999), Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women? Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rosser, Sue (1990), “Women’s Ways of Knowing”, in Rosser, Sue (ed.), Female-Friendly Science. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press, 34–54.Google Scholar
Rosser, Sue (1994), Women’s Health—Missing from U.S. Medicine. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Sarkar, Sahotra (ed.) (1996), The Legacy of the Vienna Circle: Modern Reappraisals. New York and London: Garland Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
Schiebinger, Londa (1989), The Mind Has No Sex? Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schiebinger, Londa (1999), Has Feminism Changed Science? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
van Fraassen, Bas C. (1980), The Scientific Image. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waring, Marilyn J. (1992), “Economics”, in Kramarae, Cheris and Spender, Dale (eds.), The Knowledge Explosion. New York and London: Teachers College Press, 303–309.Google Scholar
Wartofsky, Marx W. (1996), “Positivism and Politics: The Vienna Circle as a Social Movement”, in Sarkar 1996, 53–75.Google Scholar
Weisman, Carol S., and Cassard, Sandra D. (1994), “Health Consequences of Exclusion or Underrepresentation of Women in Clinical Studies (I)”, in Mastroianni, Anna C., Faden, Ruth, and Federman, Daniel (eds.), Women and Health Research, Vol. 2. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 35–40.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, Sue (1997), “Still Seeking Transformation: Feminist Challenges to Psychology”, in Stanley, Liz (ed.), Knowing Feminisms: On Academic Borders, Territories and Tribes. London: Sage Publications, 97–108.Google Scholar