Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:11:24.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Persistence of Memory: Surreal Trajectories in Bohm's Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Jeffrey A. Barrett
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper I describe the history of the surreal trajectories problem and argue that in fact it is not a problem for Bohm's theory. More specifically, I argue that one can take the particle trajectories predicted by Bohm's theory to be the actual trajectories that particles follow and that there is no reason to suppose that good particle detectors are somehow fooled in the context of the surreal trajectories experiments. Rather than showing that Bohm's theory predicts the wrong particle trajectories or that it somehow prevents one from making reliable measurements, such experiments ultimately reveal the special role played by position and the fundamental incompatibility between Bohm's theory and relativity. They also provide a striking example of the theory-ladenness of observation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 67 , Issue 4 , December 2000 , pp. 680 - 703
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

This paper is an extension of the discussion of surreal trajectories in Barrett 1999, 127–40. That section of the book was based on talk I gave at the Quantum Mechanics Workshop at the University of Pittsburgh in the Spring of 1997. And that talk owed much to conversations with Peter Lewis, David Albert, and Rob Clifton. I would also like to thank Michael Dickson and an anonymous referee for helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper.

‡

Send reprint requests to the author, Logic and Philosophy of Science, 3151 Social Science Plaza, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697–5100.

References

Aharonov, Yakir, and Vaidman, Lev (1996), “About Position Measurements Which Do Not Show the Bohmian Particle Position”, in James T. Cushing et al. (eds.), 1996, 141–154.10.1007/978-94-015-8715-0_10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albert, David Z (1992), Quantum Mechanics and Experience. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674020146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arntzenius, Frank (1994), “Relativistic Hidden-Variable Theories?”, Erkenntnis 41:207–231.10.1007/BF01128830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacciagaluppi, Guido, and Dickson, Michael (1996), “Modal Interpretations with Dynamics”, in Dieks and Vermaas (eds.), 1998.Google Scholar
Barrett, Jeffrey A. (1999), The Quantum Mechanics of Minds and Worlds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barrett, Jeffrey A. (1996), “Empirical Adequacy and the Availability of Reliable Records in Quantum Mechanics”, Philosophy of Science 63: 49–64.10.1086/289893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, Jeffrey A. (1995), “The Distribution Postulate in Bohm's Theory”, Topoi 14: 45–54.10.1007/BF00763478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, John S. (1987), Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, John S. (1982), “On the Impossible Pilot Wave”, Foundations of Physics 12:989–899. Reprinted in Bell 1987, 159–168.10.1007/BF01889272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, John S. (1981), “Quantum Mechanics for Cosmologists”, in Quantum Gravity 2, Isham, Chris, Roger Penrose, and D. Sciama (eds.), Oxford: Clarendon Press, 611–637. Reprinted in Bell 1987, 117–138.Google Scholar
Bell, John S. (1980), “de Broglie-Bohm, Delayed-Choice Double-Slit Experiment, and Density Matrix”, International Journal of Quantum Chemistry: Quantum Chemistry Symposium 14: 155–9. Reprinted in Bell 1987, 111–116.10.1002/qua.560180819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, John S. (1976b), “The Measurement Theory of Everett and de Broglie's Pilot Wave”, in Flato, M. et al. (eds.), Quantum Mechanics, Determinism, Causality, and Particles. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel, 11–17. Reprinted in Bell 1987, 93–99.10.1007/978-94-010-1440-3_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berndl, Karin, Daumer, Martin, Dürr, Detlef, Goldstein, Sheldon, and Zanghí, Nino (1995), “A Survey of Bohmian Mechanics”, Il Nuovo Cimento HOB (nos. 5–6): 737–750.10.1007/BF02741477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohm, David (1952), “A Suggested Interpretation of Quantum Theory in Terms of ‘Hidden Variables’”, Parts I and II, Physical Review 85: 166–179 and 180–193.10.1103/PhysRev.85.180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohm, David, and Hiley, B. J. (1993), The Undivided Universe: An Ontological Interpretation of Quantum Theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cushing, James T. (1996), “What Measurement Problem?”, in Robert Clifton (ed.) 1996.Google Scholar
Cushing, James T. (1994), Quantum Mechanics: Historical Contingency and the Copenhagan Hegemony. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cushing, James T., Fine, Arthur, and Goldstein, Sheldon (1996), Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum Theory: An Appraisal. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 184. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-94-015-8715-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewdney, C., Hardy, Lucien, and Squires, Euan J. (1993), “How Late Measurements of Quantum Trajectories Can Fool a Detector”, Physics Letters A 184: 6–11.10.1016/0375-9601(93)90337-YCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickson, Michael (1996), “Is the Bohm Theory Local?”, in James T. Cushing et al. (eds.), 1996, 321–30.10.1007/978-94-015-8715-0_22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickson, Michael, and Clifton, Robert (1998), “Lorentz-Invariance in Modal Interpretations”, in Dieks and Vermaas (eds.), 1998.Google Scholar
Dieks, Dennis Geert Bernardus Johan, and Vermaas, Peter E. (eds.) (1998), The Modal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science v. 60. Dordrecht; Boston, Mass.: Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-94-011-5084-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dirac, P. A. M. (1958), The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, fourth edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1063/1.3062610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dürr, Detlef, Fussender, W., Goldstein, Sheldon, and Zanghí, Nino (1993), “Comment on ‘Surrealistic Bohm Trajectories’ “, Zeitschrift für Naturforschung 48a: 1261–1262.10.1515/zna-1993-1219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dürr, Detlef, Goldstein, Sheldon, and Zanghí, Nino (1992), “Mechanics, Randomness, and Deterministic Reality”, Physics Letters A 172: 6–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dürr, Detlef, Goldstein, Sheldon, and Zanghí., Nino (1992), “Quantum Equilibrium and the Origin of Absolute Uncertainty”, Journal of Statistical Physics, 67 (5–6): 843–907.10.1007/BF01049004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dürr, Detlef, Goldstein, Sheldon, and Zanghí., Nino (1993), “A Global Equilibrium as the Foundation of Quantum Randomness”, Foundations of Physics 23(5): 721–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Englert, Berthold-Georg, Scully, Marian O., Süssmann, G., and Walther, Herbert (1992), “Surrealistic Bohm Trajectories”, Zeitschrift für Naturforschung 47a: 1175–1186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Englert, Berthold-Georg, Scully, Marian O., Süssmann, G., and Walther, Herbert. (1993), “Reply to Comment on ‘Surreal Bohm Trajectories’ “, Zeitschrift für Naturforschung 48a: 1263–1264.10.1515/zna-1993-1220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maudlin, Tim (1994), Quantum Nonlocality and Relativity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Phillipidas, C., Dewdney, C., and Hiley, B. J.: (1979), “Quantum Interference and the Quantum Potential”, Il Nuovo Cimento 52B: 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Neumann, John ([1932] 1955), Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Reprint. Translated by R. Beyer. Originally published as Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik (Berlin: Springer). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar