No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Ontology Schmontology? Identity, Individuation, and Fock Space
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2022
Abstract
The aim of this paper is modest. It is argued that if the nature of the “equivalence” between first-quantized particle theories and second-quantized (Fock Space) theories is examined closely, if the inadequacies of de Muynck's “indexed particle” version of Fock Space are recognized, and if the question is not begged against modal metaphysics, then van Fraassen's attempted deflation of ontological issues in quantum theory can be seen to fail.
- Type
- Quantum Field Theory, Bell's Theorem, and Hidden Variables
- Information
- Philosophy of Science , Volume 70 , Issue 5: Proceedings of the 2002 Biennial Meeting of The Philosophy of Science Association. Part I: Contributed Papers , December 2003 , pp. 1343 - 1356
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association
Footnotes
‡
My thanks to Arthur Fine, Laurie Brown, Paul Teller, and Steven French for comments on an earlier version of this paper.
References
Bach, Alexander (1984), “On Wave Properties of Identical Particles”, On Wave Properties of Identical Particles 104:251–254.Google Scholar
Butterfield, Jeremy (1993), “Interpretation and Identity in Quantum Theory”, Interpretation and Identity in Quantum Theory 24:443–476.Google Scholar
Cufaro-Petroni, N., Maricz, A., Sardelis, D., and Vigier, J.-P. (1984), “Causal Stochastic Interpretation of Fermi-Dirac Statistics in Terms of Distinguishable Nonlocally Correlated Particles”, Causal Stochastic Interpretation of Fermi-Dirac Statistics in Terms of Distinguishable Nonlocally Correlated Particles 101:4–6.Google Scholar
Dalla Chiara, Maria Luisa, Giuntini, Roberto, and Krause, Decio (1998), “Quasiset Theories for Micro-Objects: A Comparison”, in Castellani, Elena (ed.), Interpreting Bodies: Classical and Quantum Objects in Modern Physics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 142–152.Google Scholar
de Muynck, Willem (1975), “Distinguishable- and Indistinguishable-Particle Descriptions of Systems of Identical Particles”, Distinguishable- and Indistinguishable-Particle Descriptions of Systems of Identical Particles 14:327–346.Google Scholar
Fulling, Stephen A. (1989), Aspects of Quantum Field Theory in Curved Space Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redhead, Michael, and Teller, Paul (1991), “Particles, Particle Labels, and Quanta: The Toll of Unacknowledged Metaphysics”, Particles, Particle Labels, and Quanta: The Toll of Unacknowledged Metaphysics 21:43–62.Google Scholar
Redhead, Michael, and Teller, Paul (1992), “Particle Labels and the Theory of Indistinguishable Particles in Quantum Mechanics”, Particle Labels and the Theory of Indistinguishable Particles in Quantum Mechanics 43:201–218.Google Scholar
Robertson, Baldwin (1973), “Introduction to Field Operators in Quantum Mechanics”, Introduction to Field Operators in Quantum Mechanics 41:678–690.Google Scholar
Teller, Paul (1995), An Interpretive Introduction to Quantum Field Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Teller, Paul (1998), “Quantum Mechanics and Haecceities”, in Castellani, Elena (ed.), Interpreting Bodies: Classical and Quantum Objects in Modern Physics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 114–141.Google Scholar
Tersoff, J., and Bayer, D. (1983), “Quantum Statistics for Distinguishable Particles”, Quantum Statistics for Distinguishable Particles 50:553–554.Google Scholar
van Fraassen, Bas C. (1991), Quantum Mechanics: An Empiricist View. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar