Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T22:32:59.197Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Use of Visualizations in the Practice of Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Pauline Sargent
Pauline Sargent*
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Visualizations used in the practice of neuroscience, as one example of a scientific practice, can be sorted according to whether they represent (A) actual things, (B) theoretical models, or (C) some integration of these two. In this paper I hypothesize that an assessment of a chain of visual representations from (A) through (C) to (B) (and back again) is used, as part of the practice of scientific judgment, to assess the adequacy of the “working fit” between the theoretical model and the actual thing or process that the model is intended to explain.

Type
Philosophical Issues in Cognitive Science
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 63 , Issue S3: Supplement. Proceedings of the 1996 Biennial Meetings of the Philosophy of Science Association. Part I: Contributed Papers Sep., 1996. , 1996 , pp. S230 - S238
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

I want to thank Ronald N. Giere for his inspiration and helpful suggestions.

‡

Philosophy Department, University of Minnesota, 355 Ford Hall, 224 Church Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455.

References

Churchland, P. S. (1986), Neurophilosophy; Toward a Unified Science of the Mind-Brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Churchland, P. S. and Sejnowski, T. J. (1992), The Computational Brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchland, P. M. (1989), A Neurocomputational Perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Churchland, P. M. and Churchland, P. S. (1990), “Intertheoretic reduction: a neuroscientist's field guide”, The Neurosciences, Vol. 2: 249–256.Google Scholar
Giere, R. N. (1988), Explaining Science; A Cognitive Approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griesemer, J. R. (1990), “Material Models in Biology”, PSA 1990, Volume 2: 79–93.Google Scholar
Maienschein, J. (1991), “From Presentation to Representation in E. B. Wilson's The Cell”, The Cell 6: 227–254.Google Scholar
National Academy of Sciences and Institute of Medicine; Pechura, C. M. and Martin, J. B., (eds.) (1991), Mapping the Brain and Its Functions; Integrating Enabling Technologies into Neuroscience Research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar