Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T17:02:38.178Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On an Argument Against Reduction Sentences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Jan Berg
Jan Berg*
Affiliation:
Munich Institute of Technology
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , March 1971 , pp. 118 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © 1971 by The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Carnap, R., “Testability and Meaning,” Philosophy of Science, vols. 3-4, 1936-37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Scheffler, I., The Anatomy of Inquiry, New York, 1963.Google Scholar