Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T23:06:54.776Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Odd Couple: The Compatibility of Social Construction and Evolutionary Psychology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Ron Mallon  and
Stephen P. Stich
Ron Mallon*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Rutgers University
Stephen P. Stich
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Rutgers University
*
†Send requests for reprints to R. Mallon, Department of Philosophy, Davison Hall/Douglass Campus, Rutgers University, 26 Nichols Ave., New Brunswick, NJ 08901-2882; e-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Evolutionary psychology and social constructionism are widely regarded as fundamentally irreconcilable approaches to the social sciences. Focusing on the study of the emotions, we argue that this appearance is mistaken. Much of what appears to be an empirical disagreement between evolutionary psychologists and social constructionists over the universality or locality of emotional phenomena is actually generated by an implicit philosophical dispute resulting from the adoption of different theories of meaning and reference. We argue that once this philosophical dispute is recognized, it can be set aside. When this is done, it becomes clear that the two approaches to the emotions complement, rather than compete with, one another.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 67 , Issue 1 , March 2000 , pp. 133 - 154
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

We would like to thank Peter Carruthers, Paul Griffiths and Catherine Lutz for help and comments on earlier drafts.

References

Armstrong, David (1968), A Materialist Theory of the Mind. New York: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Averill, James (1994), “It's a Small World But a Large Stage”, in Ekman and Davidson 1994, 143–45.Google Scholar
Braddon-Mitchell, David and Jackson, Frank (1996), The Philosophy of Mind and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Briggs, Jean L. (1970), Never in Anger: Portrait of an Eskimo Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles (1872 [1998]), The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. Ekman, Paul (ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devitt, Michael and Sterelny, Kim (1987), Language and Reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ekman, Paul (1972), “Universale and Cultural Differences in Facial Expressions of Emotion”, in Cole, James K. (ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 1971, vol. 4. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 207–283.Google Scholar
Ekman, Paul. (1994), “All Emotions Are Basic”, in Ekman and Davidson 1994, 15–19.Google Scholar
Ekman, Paul and Davidson, Richard J. (eds.) (1994), The Nature of Emotion: Fundamental Questions. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ekman, Paul and Friesen, Wallace (1971), “Constants Across Cultures in the Face and Emotion”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 17: 124–129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ekman, Paul, Levenson, R., and Friesen, Wallace (1983), Autonomic Nervous System Activity Distinguished Between Emotions”, Science 221: 1208–1210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekman, Paul and Rosenberg, Erika (1997), What the Face Reveals. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford (1973), “Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture”, in The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books, 3–32.Google Scholar
Griffiths, Paul E. (1997), What Emotions Really Are. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harré, Rom (1986), “An Outline of the Social Construcionist Viewpoint”, in Harré, Rom (ed.), The Social Construction of Emotions. New York: Basil Blackwell, 2–14.Google Scholar
Harré, Rom and Finlay-Jones, Robert (1986), “Emotion Talk Across Times: Accidie and Melancholy in the Psychological Context”, in Harré, Rom (ed.), The Social Construction of Emotions. New York: Basil Blackwell, 220–227.Google Scholar
Hochschild, A. (1979), “Emotion Work, Feeling Rules and Social Structure”, American Journal of Sociology 85: 551–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horgan, Terence and Graham, George (1990). “In Defense of Southern Fundamentalism”, Philosophical Studies 62: 107–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, Suzanne J. and McKenna, Wendy (1977), Gender: An Ethnomethodological Approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lazarus, Richard (1994), “Universal Antecedents of the Emotions”, in Ekman and Davidson 1994, 163–171.Google Scholar
Levenson, Robert (1992), “Autonomic Nervous System Differences Among the Emotions”, Psychological Science 3” 23–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levenson, Robert. (1994), “Human Emotion: A Functional View”, in Ekman and Davidson 1994, 123–130.Google Scholar
Levy, Robert (1984), “The Emotions in Comparative Perspective”, in Scherer, Klaus and Ekman, Paul (eds.), Approaches to Emotion. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Lewis, David (1970), “How to Define Theoretical Terms”, Journal of Philosophy 67: 427–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David. (1972), “Psychophysical and Theoretical Identifications”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 50: 249–258.Google Scholar
Lewis, David. (1994), “Reduction of Mind”, in Guttenplan, S. (ed.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Mind. Oxford: Blackwell, 000–000.Google Scholar
Lutz, Catherine (1988), Unnatural Emotions: Everyday Sentiments on a Micronesian Atoll and Their Challenge to Western Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lycan, William (1988), Judgement and Justification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mesquita, B. and Frijda, N. (1992), “Cultural Variations in Emotions: A Review”, Psychological Bulletin 112: 179–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morsbach, H. and Tyler, W. J. (1986), “A Japanese Emotion, Amae”, in Harré, Rom (ed.), The Social Construction of Emotions. New York: Basil Blackwell, 289–307.Google Scholar
Oberoi, Harjot (1994), The Construction of Religious Boundaries: Culture, Identity, and Diversity in the Sikh Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven (1997), How the Mind Works. New York: W. W. Norton and Co.Google Scholar
Recanati, François (1993), Direct Reference: From Language to Thought. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Shweder, Richard (1985), “The Social Construction of the Person: How Is It Possible?”, in Gergen, K. and Davis, K. (eds.), The Social Construction of the Person. New York: Springer-Verlag, 41–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shweder, Richard. (1994), “‘You're Not Sick, You're Just in Love’: Emotion as an Interpretive System”, in Ekman and Davidson 1994, 32–44.Google Scholar
Stich, Stephen (1996), Deconstructing the Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tooby, John and Cosmides, Leda (1992), “The Psychological Foundations of Culture”, in Barkow, Jerome, Cosmides, Leda, and Tooby, John (eds.), The Adapted Mind. New York: Oxford University Press, 19–136.Google Scholar